2016
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.10704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits and potential of targeted sequencing analysis of liquid biopsy in patients with lung and colon carcinoma

Abstract: The circulating free tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents an alternative, minimally invasive source of tumor DNA for molecular profiling. Targeted sequencing with next generation sequencing (NGS) can assess hundred mutations starting from a low DNA input. We performed NGS analysis of ctDNA from 44 patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and 35 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC). NGS detected EGFR mutations in 17/22 plasma samples from EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients (sensitivity 77.3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
79
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
79
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As NGS is currently becoming routine for tumor tissue profiling, different assays (eg, AmpliSeq Cancer Panel, Thermo Fisher; RAS Panel, Illumina) are validated for clinical applications but have limited analytical sensitivities for ctDNA diagnostics. For example, in a proof‐of‐concept study, the FDA‐approved Oncomine targeted sequencing kit demonstrated a sensitivity of only 77% for the detection of sensitizing EGFR mutations in cfDNA of NSCLC patients . Similar results, with an overall concordance of 76% between tumor tissue and cfDNA, were reported for the AmpliSeq Cancer Panel .…”
Section: Different Methods For Mutation Detection In Routine Diagnosticssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…As NGS is currently becoming routine for tumor tissue profiling, different assays (eg, AmpliSeq Cancer Panel, Thermo Fisher; RAS Panel, Illumina) are validated for clinical applications but have limited analytical sensitivities for ctDNA diagnostics. For example, in a proof‐of‐concept study, the FDA‐approved Oncomine targeted sequencing kit demonstrated a sensitivity of only 77% for the detection of sensitizing EGFR mutations in cfDNA of NSCLC patients . Similar results, with an overall concordance of 76% between tumor tissue and cfDNA, were reported for the AmpliSeq Cancer Panel .…”
Section: Different Methods For Mutation Detection In Routine Diagnosticssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Increasing evidence shows that the majority of solid tumors, including NSCLC, are highly heterogeneous (60,61). As a consequence of such intra-tumor heterogeneity, also driver mutations might be subclonal in selected patients (60,62,63). Evidence also suggests that the tumor heterogeneity is likely to increase over the time with the different lines of therapy.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rachiglio et al [95] recently showed that, in CRC patients, the sensitivity of the NGS plasma analysis for RAS mutations was 100% in patients without resection of the primary tumour before blood collection, and 46.2% in patients with primary tumour resected before enrollment. Their results suggest the importance of identifying specific clinical characteristics to help select patients with sufficient levels of ctDNA for plasma NGS analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%