1992
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.46.4161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limiting rotational period of neutron stars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
62
0
6

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(19 reference statements)
8
62
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The limiting relation is analogous to a previously obtained lower limit on the Kepler period of a rotating star as a function of its mass ( [10,13]), and to an even earlier analysis of limits on the gravitational redshift from neutron stars ( [14]). …”
Section: Motivationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The limiting relation is analogous to a previously obtained lower limit on the Kepler period of a rotating star as a function of its mass ( [10,13]), and to an even earlier analysis of limits on the gravitational redshift from neutron stars ( [14]). …”
Section: Motivationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…An EOS thus maximizes rotation if it maximizes the gravitational force at the equator of a rotating star -if it allows stars of large mass and small radius. To allow high mass stars, the EOS must be stiff at high density, and for the radius of the high-mass configuration to be small, the EOS must be softer at low density, allowing greater compression in the outer part of the star [46,47]. In our parameter space, a high angular velocity then restricts one to a region with large values of Γ 2 and Γ 3 , and small values of p 1 and Γ 1 .…”
Section: Maximum Spinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The region to the left of the Pt = 0.65 MeV fm −3 curve is forbidden if Vela glitches are due to angular momentum transfers between the crust and core, as discussed in Link, Epstein & Lattimer [94]. For comparison, the region excluded by causality alone lies to the left of the dashed curve labelled "causality" as determined by Lattimer et al [93] and Glendenning [113] constraint ∆I/I ≥ 0.014: R > 3.9 + 3.5M/M ⊙ − 0.08(M/M ⊙ ) 2 km .…”
Section: Crustal Fraction Of the Moment Of Inertiamentioning
confidence: 99%