2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2004.09.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limiting flux in skimmed milk ultrafiltration: impact of electrostatic repulsion due to casein micelles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(17 reference statements)
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extent of the changes on colloidal calcium phosphate during UF depends mainly on processing conditions (such as temperature and pH of filtration), and micellar dissociation has been reported to occur during UF (Singh 2007). Changes in the chemical and physical properties of skim milk during membrane filtration have been extensively investigated (JimenezLopez et al 2008;Karlsson et al 2005); the casein micelles are recognized as key factors in the processing performance during filtration (David et al 2008;Piry et al 2008;Rabiller-Baudry et al 2005). However, the effects of UF on the structure function of the casein micelles have received very little attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent of the changes on colloidal calcium phosphate during UF depends mainly on processing conditions (such as temperature and pH of filtration), and micellar dissociation has been reported to occur during UF (Singh 2007). Changes in the chemical and physical properties of skim milk during membrane filtration have been extensively investigated (JimenezLopez et al 2008;Karlsson et al 2005); the casein micelles are recognized as key factors in the processing performance during filtration (David et al 2008;Piry et al 2008;Rabiller-Baudry et al 2005). However, the effects of UF on the structure function of the casein micelles have received very little attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the past 20 years, researchers have studied the electrostatic properties of proteins and their contribution to ultrafiltration performance [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. This work predominantly addressed the electrostatic effects on the solute partitioning, i.e., protein sieving under various electrostatic conditions, although the electrostatic contributions to solution transport, i.e., the volumetric permeate flux [1,3,6,18], has also been discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…, M5 Carbosep, Orelis, Miribel, France) adapted from [26] are reported in Figure 9. Looking at the J limiting vs. μ graph for both UF organic and inorganic membranes, it appears that the slope is independent of the membrane material with similar cut-off or pore size.…”
Section: Possible Impact Of Proteins On Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…·s −1 for higher values. For both size and μ measurements, dilution of modified and unmodified skim milks was achieved with the respective aqueous phase (ultrafiltrate at the same pH) to avoid equilibrium displacement according to previously validated protocol ( [26] and related papers).…”
Section: Size and Electrophoretic Mobility Of Casein Micelles And Aggmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation