1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7152(99)00054-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limiting behavior of random permanents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to apply Jensen's formula we observe that the left hand side of the formula, for zero mean random matrices A, and g A (z) = Per(J + zA) is essentially bounded from above by the the logarithm of the second moment g A (r). We prove in Lemma 7 (which provides a simplified version of a proof by Rempała and Wesołowski [18]) that this second moment is upper-bounded by a term that scales at most exponentially with the square of r:…”
Section: Roots Of Random Interpolating Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to apply Jensen's formula we observe that the left hand side of the formula, for zero mean random matrices A, and g A (z) = Per(J + zA) is essentially bounded from above by the the logarithm of the second moment g A (r). We prove in Lemma 7 (which provides a simplified version of a proof by Rempała and Wesołowski [18]) that this second moment is upper-bounded by a term that scales at most exponentially with the square of r:…”
Section: Roots Of Random Interpolating Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We begin with an upper-bound on the average sensitivity of the permanent of a random matrix that can also be derived from the work of Rempała and Wesołowski [18] (see Proposition 1).…”
Section: Permanent-interpolating-polynomial As a Random Polynomialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now (12) follows from the estimates in Lemma 7 (for the lower bound in the case k > 1 use k − 1 ≤ n).…”
Section: Proof Of the Upper Bounds In Theoremmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Say we allow ξ to have a point mass at zero. Then by the known central limit theorem (see [12]) we know that per A n /(n log n) converges to 1 in probability (one needs to truncate ξ at some finite value). In the algorithm from the above proof, one can apply the same argument to the matrix B c , to show that per A n /(n log n) converges in probability to β for β > 1.…”
Section: Lower Bounds and The Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation