2001
DOI: 10.1007/s000140050150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limites d'espaces tangents � une surface normale

Abstract: Résumé. Nousétudions l'ensemble des hyperplans limites d'hyperplans tangentsà un germe de surface normale. Nous caractérisons ces hyperplans par le fait que le nombre de Milnor de leur section avec la surface n'est pas minimum. Nous donnons ensuite une généralisation des résultats de [14] en termes de résolution simultanée faible de la famille des sections hyperplanes, ce qui nous permet de déterminer avec précision les tangentes exceptionnelles d'une surface normale. Grâceà ces résultats, nous démontrons que … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus each limit of tangent hyperplanes at a sequence of points converging to 0 in Z j {0} contains L j . We will show there exist infinitely many such limits, which, by definition, means that L j is an exceptional tangent line (this is one of the two implications of Proposition 6.3 of Snoussi [43], see also Proposition 2.2.1 of [25], but we did not find a clear statement in the literature). Indeed, for any generic (n − 2)-plane H let ℓ H : C n → C 2 be the projection with kernel H. By Lemma 3.8 the strict transform Π * of the polar Π of ℓ H | X intersects ν∈Γj E ν .…”
Section: The Thin Piecesmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus each limit of tangent hyperplanes at a sequence of points converging to 0 in Z j {0} contains L j . We will show there exist infinitely many such limits, which, by definition, means that L j is an exceptional tangent line (this is one of the two implications of Proposition 6.3 of Snoussi [43], see also Proposition 2.2.1 of [25], but we did not find a clear statement in the literature). Indeed, for any generic (n − 2)-plane H let ℓ H : C n → C 2 be the projection with kernel H. By Lemma 3.8 the strict transform Π * of the polar Π of ℓ H | X intersects ν∈Γj E ν .…”
Section: The Thin Piecesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We will take a resolution approach to construct the thick-thin decomposition, but another way of constructing it is as follows. Recall (see [43,25]) that a line L tangent to X at 0 is exceptional if the limit at 0 of tangent planes to X along a curve in X tangent to L at 0 depends on the choice of this curve. Just finitely many tangent lines to X at 0 are exceptional.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 3.1. In [10], we proved that a singular point of the normalized blow-up of the origin of a germ of a normal surface singularity is always a base point of the linear system of polar curves. We used to think that the similar behavior of the hyperplane sections in the blow-up of the origin with the polar curves in the Nash modification of normal surfaces would suggest that all singular points of the normalized Nash modification of a normal surface are fixed points of the family of hyperplane sections.…”
Section: The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the singular points of the normalized blow-up of the origin of a normal germ of a surface are fixed points of the family of polar curves. Meanwhile a singular point of the normalized Nash modification of a normal germ of surface need not be a fixed point of the family of hyperplane sections ; see [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [2] R. Bondil gives an algebraic µ-constant theorem for linear families of plane curves. Other results have been obtained in the case where π is the restriction to (Z, z) of a linear projection of (C n , 0) onto (C 2 , 0) (see [1], [4], [18]). At last, the topology of the morphism π has been studied in [13] and [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%