2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-015-0492-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited utility of MRA for acute bowel ischemia after portal venous phase CT

Abstract: Portal venous phase CT and MRA demonstrate a high degree of concordance for vascular evaluation. Reviewed CT examinations were sufficient to assess the patency of the mesenteric vasculature, but vascular findings were not reported in most cases. A direct description within the report may have obviated the request for further MR imaging. MRA adds little value after portal venous CT in assessing bowel ischemia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This case study delineates potential diagnostic limitations, including colonoscopy and colonic mucosal biopsy that help determine the etiology of ischemic colitis [ 15 ]. The other diagnostic methods include barium enema, CT angiography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA); however, their use is restricted due to potential limitations in the setting of ischemic colitis [ 18 - 19 ]. The underlying comorbidities and recurrent bleeding in severe ischemic colitis challenge its diagnostic management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This case study delineates potential diagnostic limitations, including colonoscopy and colonic mucosal biopsy that help determine the etiology of ischemic colitis [ 15 ]. The other diagnostic methods include barium enema, CT angiography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA); however, their use is restricted due to potential limitations in the setting of ischemic colitis [ 18 - 19 ]. The underlying comorbidities and recurrent bleeding in severe ischemic colitis challenge its diagnostic management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, only small bowel injury was evaluated in this study and vascular impairment was not analyzed, which may be a problem since the diagnosis of arterial AMI relies strongly on the visualization of arterial insufficiency (occlusion or vasoconstriction in nonocclusive arterial AMI). However, the performance of MR angiography of the mesenteric vascularization has been shown to be good, 38 and Shetty and al found no difference with CT angiography for vascular analysis in AMI patients 39 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the performance of MR angiography of the mesenteric vascularization has been shown to be good, 38 and Shetty and al found no difference with CT angiography for vascular analysis in AMI patients. 39…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRA is tailored to depict mesenteric vasculature and less likely to show ischemic findings within the bowel itself compared to CT, such as pneumatosis and portovenous gas; it is also unlikely to provide additional information in the acute setting if portal venous phase CT has already been performed [48]. MRA without contrast can be attempted in some cases; however, evaluation of smaller vessels may be suboptimal [46].…”
Section: Discussion Of Procedures By Variantmentioning
confidence: 99%