1995
DOI: 10.1016/0928-0987(94)00069-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited sampling models for the antiretroviral agent didanosine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…30 Five anti-infective agents were each studied in 2 separate trials, as described in Table 2. 25,28,[30][31][32]35,38,39,42,43 Classification according to level of evidence is important when there are discrepant results between studies for suggested sampling times to characterize pharmacokinetic parameters. As a general guideline, clinicians may choose to place more weight on results of studies classified as having a higher level of evidence.…”
Section: Discussion Study Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…30 Five anti-infective agents were each studied in 2 separate trials, as described in Table 2. 25,28,[30][31][32]35,38,39,42,43 Classification according to level of evidence is important when there are discrepant results between studies for suggested sampling times to characterize pharmacokinetic parameters. As a general guideline, clinicians may choose to place more weight on results of studies classified as having a higher level of evidence.…”
Section: Discussion Study Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level I studies of didanosine and zidovudine also provided 1-sample limited-sampling strategies to predict a second pharmacokinetic parameter, maximum drug concentration (C max ). 25,26 Of the level I studies, the study of a validated limitedsampling strategy for nevirapine probably provided the most Table 1. Classification of studies of limited sampling strategies [5][6][7]9 Level of Evidence Description Level I (evidence obtained from at least one properly…”
Section: Discussion Study Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations