2005
DOI: 10.1248/bpb.28.760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited Role of P-Glycoprotein in the Intestinal Absorption of Cyclosporin A

Abstract: Cyclosporin A (CsA), a powerful immunosuppressive agent, is orally administered to prevent rejection in new organ transplants and to treat a variety of autoimmune diseases.1) The intestinal absorption of CsA following oral administration is poor (typically 20-50%) and varies greatly among patients, 2) owing to its relatively high molecular weight (1202.6), poor solubility in aqueous fluids, 3) site-specific absorption in the small intestine, 4) and intestinal firstpass metabolism by the Cyp450 system. 5) Furth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1 study in 60 adult liver transplant patients, cyclosporine AUC 0–24 h increased by 30% when the patients were changed from bid dosing (1.1‐mg/kg single doses) to once‐daily dosing (2.2‐mg/kg single dose) 35 . Thus, it can be hypothesized that the inhibitory effects of cyclosporine on CYP3A4 and P‐glycoprotein 13 , 36 38 result in auto‐inhibition and dose‐dependent pharmacokinetics at low single doses, such as those used in our patients, whereas complete saturation of CYP3A4 or P‐glycoprotein renders cyclosporine pharmacokinetics dose‐linear after a certain threshold dose is exceeded 39 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 1 study in 60 adult liver transplant patients, cyclosporine AUC 0–24 h increased by 30% when the patients were changed from bid dosing (1.1‐mg/kg single doses) to once‐daily dosing (2.2‐mg/kg single dose) 35 . Thus, it can be hypothesized that the inhibitory effects of cyclosporine on CYP3A4 and P‐glycoprotein 13 , 36 38 result in auto‐inhibition and dose‐dependent pharmacokinetics at low single doses, such as those used in our patients, whereas complete saturation of CYP3A4 or P‐glycoprotein renders cyclosporine pharmacokinetics dose‐linear after a certain threshold dose is exceeded 39 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…35 Thus, it can be hypothesized that the inhibitory effects of cyclosporine on CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein 13,[36][37][38] result in auto-inhibition and dose-dependent pharmacokinetics at low single doses, such as those used in our patients, whereas complete saturation of CYP3A4 or P-glycoprotein renders cyclosporine pharmacokinetics dose-linear after a certain threshold dose is exceeded. 39 As young children have a larger clearance/body weight than older children, 9 their cyclosporine halflife is shorter, leading to greater peak-to-trough ratios. Therefore, to avoid high cyclosporine peaks associated with acute nephrotoxicity 40 and tremor, 41 we divided the daily dose into 3 single doses in young children in our center.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nifedipine is a P-gp substrate but neither the PBPK nor the indirect method can distinguish between P-gp-mediated efflux and intestinal metabolism. P-gp-mediated intestinal efflux is often expected to be minimal due to high intestinal concentrations, especially for high-solubility drugs (Kwon et al, 2004;Cao et al, 2005) and a limited role of P-gp has been reported for cyclosporine A (Lee et al, 2005), tacrolimus (Saitoh et al, 2006), and verapamil (Cao et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies, particularly using Mdr1a Ϫ/Ϫ and Mdr1a/ 1b Ϫ/Ϫ mice, have demonstrated that P-gp limits oral availability and penetration into the brain and mediates biliary and urinary excretion by actively extruding xenobiotics into the adjacent luminal space (Chen et al, 2003;Mizuno et al, 2003). For instance, Mdr1a/1b Ϫ/Ϫ mice exhibited greater plasma concentrations than wild-type mice after oral administration of paclitaxel (Sparreboom et al, 1997), fexofenadine (Tahara et al, 2005), cyclosporin A (Lee et al, 2005), etoposide (Allen et al, 2003), and vinblastine (Ogihara et al, 2006). For daunomycin, loperamide, quinidine, ritonavir, and verapamil, the permeability-surface area product in the small intestine increased more than three times in Mdr1a/1b Ϫ/Ϫ mice (Adachi et al, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%