2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11336-005-1295-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited Information Goodness-of-fit Testing in Multidimensional Contingency Tables

Abstract: multivariate discrete data, categorical data analysis, multivariate multinomial distribution, composite likelihood, item response theory, Lisrel,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
215
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
215
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Indicatively, we mention the pioneering work of Simonoff (1983), as well as Dong and Simonoff (1995), and Burman (2004). Maydeu-Olivares and Joe (2006) propose a family of goodness-of-fit statistics for testing composite null hypothesis in multidimensional contingency tables based on a limited information method (see also references cited therein). Our Bayesian approach could be developed and compared to this.…”
Section: Discussion and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indicatively, we mention the pioneering work of Simonoff (1983), as well as Dong and Simonoff (1995), and Burman (2004). Maydeu-Olivares and Joe (2006) propose a family of goodness-of-fit statistics for testing composite null hypothesis in multidimensional contingency tables based on a limited information method (see also references cited therein). Our Bayesian approach could be developed and compared to this.…”
Section: Discussion and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include Pearsons chi-square test, the likelihood ratio test, and Maydeu-Olivares and Joe's (2006) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items with significance at the 0.05 level were considered inappropriate. M2 statistics for dichotomous data fit (Maydeu-Olivares and Joe, 2006) were considered for overall model fit; at this point, a model is considered adequate when the comparative fit index (CFI) and TLI > 0.90 and RMSEA and SRMSR < 0.8. Finally, the remaining items with difficult and discrimination standard errors bigger than one were deleted, according with cutoff criteria suggested by Hambleton and Swaminathan (2010).…”
Section: Data Analysis Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%