2016
DOI: 10.1186/s11689-016-9140-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited impact of Cntn4 mutation on autism-related traits in developing and adult C57BL/6J mice

Abstract: BackgroundMouse models offer an essential tool to unravel the impact of genetic mutations on autism-related phenotypes. The behavioral impact of some important candidate gene models for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has not yet been studied, and existing characterizations mostly describe behavioral phenotypes at adult ages, disregarding the developmental nature of the disorder. In this context, the behavioral influence of CNTN4, one of the strongest suggested ASD candidate genes, is unknown. Here, we used our… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we compared cell surface expression levels of several glutamate and GABA receptors in ASD related brain region of three different ASD mouse models ( Shank2 −/− , Shank3 αβ −/− and Cntn4 −/− ) aiming on unraveling molecular abnormalities in excitatory and/or inhibitory signaling components which are common to all three mouse models. It is important to note that the mouse models used in this study differ with respect to their ASD-related behavior: Shank2 −/− and Shank3 αβ −/− mice clearly show repetitive, stereotyped behavior and deficits in social interactions, though in varying degrees (Schmeisser et al, 2012 ; Vicidomini et al, 2017 ; Monteiro and Feng, 2017 ), whereas ASD-related behavior in Cntn4 −/− has been less well characterized but appears to be much less pronounced (Molenhuis et al, 2016 ). Our data suggest that—as might have been expected—genetic deficiency of Shank2 and Shank3 yields relatively similar changes in cell surface glutamate and GABA receptor expression levels: on the whole, a downregulation of cell surface ionotropic glutamate receptor subunits (GluN1, GluA2 and GluA1) could be observed in several ASD-related brain regions (especially in the striatum and thalamus) whereas almost no changes in the expression of cell surface ionotropic GABA receptors was seen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In this study, we compared cell surface expression levels of several glutamate and GABA receptors in ASD related brain region of three different ASD mouse models ( Shank2 −/− , Shank3 αβ −/− and Cntn4 −/− ) aiming on unraveling molecular abnormalities in excitatory and/or inhibitory signaling components which are common to all three mouse models. It is important to note that the mouse models used in this study differ with respect to their ASD-related behavior: Shank2 −/− and Shank3 αβ −/− mice clearly show repetitive, stereotyped behavior and deficits in social interactions, though in varying degrees (Schmeisser et al, 2012 ; Vicidomini et al, 2017 ; Monteiro and Feng, 2017 ), whereas ASD-related behavior in Cntn4 −/− has been less well characterized but appears to be much less pronounced (Molenhuis et al, 2016 ). Our data suggest that—as might have been expected—genetic deficiency of Shank2 and Shank3 yields relatively similar changes in cell surface glutamate and GABA receptor expression levels: on the whole, a downregulation of cell surface ionotropic glutamate receptor subunits (GluN1, GluA2 and GluA1) could be observed in several ASD-related brain regions (especially in the striatum and thalamus) whereas almost no changes in the expression of cell surface ionotropic GABA receptors was seen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Deficiency of ASD-risk gene Cntn4 in mice was found to cause no aberrations in autism-like behavior, but did affect sensory behavior and cognitive performance. 33 Elaboration of the set of behavioral experiments and including a set of experiments during the development, may bring a subtle behavioral phenotype to view. These data suggests that disruption of Cntn5 has no or limited influence on social, explorative and repetitive behavior in our mouse model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Molenhuis et al (2016) analyzed the development of neurological phenotypes in Cntn4-deficient mice at various developmental ages through an extended SHIRPA battery of tests. This study also included assessments for ASD-related behaviors such as the juvenile social interaction test, three-chamber social interaction test, novel object investigation task and the Barnes maze; however, Cntn4-deficiency was not observed to affect ASD-related behaviors ( Molenhuis et al, 2016 ). Compared to wild-type littermates, Cntn4-deficient mice did not show any further changes in grooming behavior, social interaction, sensorimotor coordination, or cognitive flexibility ( Molenhuis et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Neurophysiological Roles Of Chl1 Cntn6 mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study also included assessments for ASD-related behaviors such as the juvenile social interaction test, three-chamber social interaction test, novel object investigation task and the Barnes maze; however, Cntn4-deficiency was not observed to affect ASD-related behaviors ( Molenhuis et al, 2016 ). Compared to wild-type littermates, Cntn4-deficient mice did not show any further changes in grooming behavior, social interaction, sensorimotor coordination, or cognitive flexibility ( Molenhuis et al, 2016 ). No defects in olfaction were observed in Cntn4-deficient mice, which is unexpected since Cntn4 has been found to play a role in the establishment of odor maps ( Kaneko-Goto et al, 2008 ).…”
Section: Neurophysiological Roles Of Chl1 Cntn6 mentioning
confidence: 99%