2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-019-01228-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited fine-scale larval dispersal of the threatened brooding corals Heliopora spp. as evidenced by population genetics and numerical simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These migration rates are comparable to those found in brooding coral Helipora spp. in Sekisei Lagoon, which ranged from 0.4 to 20.2% (Taninaka et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These migration rates are comparable to those found in brooding coral Helipora spp. in Sekisei Lagoon, which ranged from 0.4 to 20.2% (Taninaka et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heliopora coerulea is a brooding species whose internal fertilization occurs inside female polyps, and almost-competent larvae are released once a year during the summer (Babcock, 1990;Harii et al, 2002;. Consistent with the short dispersal duration (Harii et al, 2002), Harii and Kayanne (2003) used settlement tiles in Shiraho reef and directly demonstrated that H. coerulea larvae settle within a range of 350 m. Previous population genetic studies performed using microsatellite markers and numerical simulation analyses indicated that larval dispersal among different reef habitats is quite limited (Taninaka et al, 2019); however, one population genetic analysis study reported infrequent long-distance larval dispersal in multiple generations (Yasuda et al, 2014). Strong population genetic differentiation has been observed within a 20 m × 40 km area (Taninaka et al, 2019), indicating that H. coerulea may have a finer SGS even within a continuous large population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…While several previous studies have reported good agreement between oceanographic models and genetic analysis and have provided robust and straightforward interpretations of larval dispersal occurring on an ecological timescale (e.g. Galindo et al 2006; White et al 2010; Sunday et al 2014; Taninaka et al 2019), only a few have discussed the usefulness of oceanographic modeling for identifying alternative hypotheses or provided additional insights into the causes of observed population genetic structure (Galindo et al 2010; Crandall et al 2014). By applying Markov chain simulation in the numerical simulation, we could also include the effect of migration over multiple generations, which is easier to compare with genetic results than a single generation simulation result in terms of time-scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oceanographic simulation, on the other hand, can capture snapshots of larval dispersal, while even a sophisticated biophysical model cannot accurately simulate larval behavior, recruitment, and survival in the ocean (White et al, 2019). It is therefore important to integrate different methods to estimate larval dispersal (Marko and Hart, 2017), although few studies have attempted to do so (but see Schunter et al, 2011; Alberto et al, 2011; Nakabayashi et al, 2019; Taninaka et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%