2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-016-1152-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited ecological risk of insect-resistance transgene flow from cultivated rice to its wild ancestor based on life-cycle fitness assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most pertinent use of this tool is to estimate transgene flow frequencies from GE crops to their non-GE counterparts and to wild/weedy relative species, which is important to assess social-economic and particularly environmental impacts caused by transgene flow as discussed previously ( Ellstrand 1992 , 2003 ; Yong and Kim 2001 ; Lu and Snow 2005 ; Loureiro et al 2009 ; Lu and Yang 2009 ). If a transgene can move from a GE crop to its wild/weedy relatives at a comparatively high frequency ( Song et al 2003 a ; Chen et al 2004 ; Weekes et al 2005 ) and bring considerable fitness effects (benefit or cost) to the wild or weedy relatives ( Yang et al 2011 ; Li et al 2016 ), rigorous biosafety measures should be taken to minimize the undesired environmental consequences ( Lu and Snow 2005 ; Lu and Yang 2009 ; Lu et al 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most pertinent use of this tool is to estimate transgene flow frequencies from GE crops to their non-GE counterparts and to wild/weedy relative species, which is important to assess social-economic and particularly environmental impacts caused by transgene flow as discussed previously ( Ellstrand 1992 , 2003 ; Yong and Kim 2001 ; Lu and Snow 2005 ; Loureiro et al 2009 ; Lu and Yang 2009 ). If a transgene can move from a GE crop to its wild/weedy relatives at a comparatively high frequency ( Song et al 2003 a ; Chen et al 2004 ; Weekes et al 2005 ) and bring considerable fitness effects (benefit or cost) to the wild or weedy relatives ( Yang et al 2011 ; Li et al 2016 ), rigorous biosafety measures should be taken to minimize the undesired environmental consequences ( Lu and Snow 2005 ; Lu and Yang 2009 ; Lu et al 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that the major crop species, including wheat, rice, maize, soybean, and oil rapes, can hybridize spontaneously with their wild relatives occurring in the vicinity [3,[9][10][11][12][13]. Pollen-mediated crop-to-wild transgene flow or hybridization may result in unwanted environmental and ecological consequences if the transgene acquired by the wild relative populations can confer considerable fitness benefits or costs [4,6,8,[14][15][16]. Therefore, assessing the potential environmental impact caused by transgene flow becomes a basic requirement as a regulatory procedure before any GE crop is cultivated for commercial production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, transgenic fitness is estimated involving hybrid descendants derived from artificial crosses between a GE crop and wild relative species, simulating transgene flow from a GE crop to wild populations [14,15,19,21,24]. Undoubtedly, results generated from these studies have contributed significantly to the assessment of the potential environmental impact caused by transgene flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the Bt/CpTI transgene was still effective in later generations derived from crosses between transgenic rice and weedy rice or wild rice, resulting in lower insect damage and increased fecundity under high insect pressure. 8,12,13 However, previous studies have indicated that the transgenic rice and hybrid progeny with the exogenous Bt gene usually had an obvious yield disadvantage compared with the parental rice line in the field or greenhouse with relatively low insect pressure conditions. [14][15][16][17][18] Liang et al 19 found that the empty grain number per spike of transgenic cry1Ab/c rice HH1 was significantly higher than that of parent rice MH63 under the field conditions with low insect pressure sprayed with insecticide, and the grain filling rate of HH1 was lower than that of MH63.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%