2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited Cu(II) binding to biochar DOM: Evidence from C K-edge NEXAFS and EEM-PARAFAC combined with two-dimensional correlation analysis

Abstract: h i g h l i g h t s NEXAFS and EEM were used to probe the capacity of biochar DOM to bind Cu(II). Pyrolysis temperature and DOM components determine the binding capacity. Humic components showed a higher Cu-binding capacity than protein component. The capacity of DOM to bind Cu(II) reduced with rising pyrolysis temperature. The DOM generally had low Cu(II) binding capacity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Proteinlike substances were representative of the biodegradable and humiclike substances and can be referred to as non-biodegradable components [ 46 ]. Similar studies found that the order of changes in the three components’ different feedstocks with increasing pyrolysis temperatures was proteinlike=humic acid → fulvic acid for chicken biochar, and fulvic acid → humic acid → proteinlike for dairy manure biochar [ 44 ]. Baken et al [ 47 ] indicated that with changes in the pyrolysis temperature, humiclike substances responded faster than proteinlike substances because of the higher aromaticity of the former.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proteinlike substances were representative of the biodegradable and humiclike substances and can be referred to as non-biodegradable components [ 46 ]. Similar studies found that the order of changes in the three components’ different feedstocks with increasing pyrolysis temperatures was proteinlike=humic acid → fulvic acid for chicken biochar, and fulvic acid → humic acid → proteinlike for dairy manure biochar [ 44 ]. Baken et al [ 47 ] indicated that with changes in the pyrolysis temperature, humiclike substances responded faster than proteinlike substances because of the higher aromaticity of the former.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…2D-COS analysis helps to enhance the deconvolution of overlapping peaks and provides information on the heterogeneous distribution of PA-derived DOM with the pyrolysis temperature as an external perturbation [ 44 ]. The synchronous fluorescence spectra of PA in the 200–600 nm region ( Figure 3 A) exhibited three predominant autopeaks at 450, 420, 380, and 360 nm with a small peak at 320 nm identified from the cross-peaks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The various peaks for Mnt are still discernible in the spectrum of CMnt, but their intensities are significantly reduced. The FTIR spectra of both 0.5C and CMnt show peaks due to CH 3 and CH 2 bending (2790 and 2860 cm −1 ), carbonyl C=O in quinone, ester, or carboxyl (1700 cm −1 ), C-O stretching in hydroxyl, ester, or ether (1460-1000 cm −1 ), and aromatic C-Hout-of-plane bending (900-750 cm −1 ) (Wei et al, 2020). The intensity of these peaks increases with the concentration of glucose added, reflecting the enhanced formation of hydrochar-montmorillonite nanocomposites.…”
Section: Mechanisms Involved In the Formation Of Hydrochar-montmorillonite Nanocompositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] In the field of environmental chemistry, the use of PARAFAC for the analysis of untreated samples measured with fluorescence spectroscopy is largely and successfully applied for characterizing organic matter in water systems. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] Such good results reported in the literature pave the way for the possibility of extending the use of this approach to reach a deeper understanding of the nature of any fluorophore directly in the sample: the use of frontface fluorescence, combined with three-way analysis of the data, seems an easier and faster choice, which could be applied as an alternative to long and tedious lab procedures in many fields of research. In particular, this approach could be extended to aim at a deeper characterization of the chemical and physico-chemical changes of different components in a complex sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In particular, in the field of food science, it has been used to characterize foods that have undergone industrial processes and subjected to different storage conditions or for traceability of protected designation of origin products 5–17 . In the field of environmental chemistry, the use of PARAFAC for the analysis of untreated samples measured with fluorescence spectroscopy is largely and successfully applied for characterizing organic matter in water systems 18–34 . Such good results reported in the literature pave the way for the possibility of extending the use of this approach to reach a deeper understanding of the nature of any fluorophore directly in the sample: the use of front‐face fluorescence, combined with three‐way analysis of the data, seems an easier and faster choice, which could be applied as an alternative to long and tedious lab procedures in many fields of research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%