2014
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1400214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited alpine climatic warming and modeled phenology advancement for three alpine species in the Northeast United States

Abstract: Modeled trends in phenological advancement and sensitivity for three northeastern alpine species are less pronounced compared with lower elevations in the region, and this small shift in flower timing did not increase risk of frost damage. Potential reasons for limited earlier phenological advancement at higher elevations include a slower warming trend and increased cloud exposure with elevation and/or inadequate chilling requirements.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because some of the marginality hotspots are also recognized refugia, and refugia are typically characterized by climate stability (Mosblech et al, 2011), it is plausible to think that marginality hotspots may also have experienced a stable climate historically (e.g. Kimball, Davis, Weihrauch, Murray, & Rancourt, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because some of the marginality hotspots are also recognized refugia, and refugia are typically characterized by climate stability (Mosblech et al, 2011), it is plausible to think that marginality hotspots may also have experienced a stable climate historically (e.g. Kimball, Davis, Weihrauch, Murray, & Rancourt, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different species are known to have different flowering time temperature sensitivity, and, thus, variation among species is to be expected (Calinger et al., ; Hart et al., ; Kimball, Davis, Weihrauch, Murray, & Rancourt, ; Ledneva, Miller‐Rushing, Primack, & Imbres, ; Mazer et al., ; Miller‐Rushing & Primack, ; Panchen et al., ; Parmesan, ). However, the magnitude of the variation is surprisingly high in contrast to other studies (Oberbauer et al., ; Wolkovich et al., ) but not unprecedented (Olsson & Ågren, ; Wagner & Simons, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this measure can only be used to predict how responsive a species might be to climate change (Calinger et al, 2013;Davis et al, 2015). The sum of temperature above a threshold temperature on consecutive days influences timing of phenological events, that is the cumulative effect of temperature or growing degree days (Kimball et al, 2014). Most phenology-climate change research typically uses monthly mean temperatures as an approximation for the cumulative effect of temperature on the timing of plant phenological events.…”
Section: Plant Reproductive Phenology In a Changing Climatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plants first undergo a period of vernalisation or a chilling period prior to flowering, a mechanism to prevent flowering during a warm period mid-winter (Bernier and Périlleux, 2005). Once the chilling requirements are met, a cumulative period of warm temperatures above a threshold temperature must be met before the plant initiates flowering (Rathcke and Lacey, 1985;Bernier and Périlleux, 2005;Kimball et al, 2014). Each species has different vernalisation, cumulative temperature and threshold temperature requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation