Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited Access to On-Label Formulations of Buprenorphine for Chronic Pain as Compared with Conventional Opioids

Abstract: Importance Buprenorphine is a Schedule III analgesic that is recommended as the firstline long-acting opioid for the treatment of chronic pain due to its ceiling effect on respiratory depression, adverse effect profile, and analgesic efficacy. However, prescription drug coverage policies commonly require that patients try and fail multiple Schedule II conventional opioids before approval of on-label use of buprenorphine for chronic pain. Desig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12,13 Compared with other opioids like morphine, oxycodone, or fentanyl, access to buprenorphine for LTOT patients with chronic pain has been restricted by many insurance plans. 39 It is important to remove the barriers to access to buprenorphine treatment for CPOD given that over 10 million US adults are likely on LTOT. It is unknown how many of these patients on LTOT may be experiencing worsening pain or difficulty with opioid taper due to CPOD.…”
Section: Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 Compared with other opioids like morphine, oxycodone, or fentanyl, access to buprenorphine for LTOT patients with chronic pain has been restricted by many insurance plans. 39 It is important to remove the barriers to access to buprenorphine treatment for CPOD given that over 10 million US adults are likely on LTOT. It is unknown how many of these patients on LTOT may be experiencing worsening pain or difficulty with opioid taper due to CPOD.…”
Section: Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Schedule III classification of buprenorphine by the US Drug Enforcement Administration confirms its enhanced safety profile and reduced abuse potential [77]. As a result, buprenorphine should be considered a first-line treatment for chronic pain in appropriate patients identified by risk/benefit analyses [62]. The increased bioavailability (46-65%) and extended available dose range (75-900 μg) of buprenorphine buccal film compared with that of the buprenorphine transdermal system support its preferential consideration for chronic pain treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buprenorphine buccal film has advantages over the transdermal formulation and is considered by many practitioners to be a preferential treatment option over Schedule II opioids on the basis of efficacy and safety demonstrated by clinical studies [44][45][46]62]. This review article is thus focused on the buccal formulation, with the primary objective of providing an overview of the clinical studies that have examined buprenorphine buccal film as a resource for clinicians who are seeking alternative treatments for chronic pain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many prescription drug coverage policies require therapeutic trials of multiple Schedule II opioids to fail before issuing an approval for payment of buprenorphine for chronic pain. 48 This suboptimal or limited coverage and reimbursement has resulted in a significant access hurdle to buprenorphine treatment for chronic pain, despite its being regarded as a relatively safer and effective opioid. 5 Although a US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) X-waiver was never required for prescribing buccal or transdermal buprenorphine for chronic pain, much confusion on this topic has resulted in additional access barriers.…”
Section: Payer Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%