1982
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(82)80461-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations on the use of phenothiazines and local anaesthetics as indicators of calmodulin function in intact cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) was similar to comparable findings for other calmodulin-dependent reaction. These aspects render it likely that the actions were mediated through calmodulin and not via one of the reported nonspecific actions of phenothiazines on cells (23,24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) was similar to comparable findings for other calmodulin-dependent reaction. These aspects render it likely that the actions were mediated through calmodulin and not via one of the reported nonspecific actions of phenothiazines on cells (23,24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our sys tem of fetal neurons, neither calmidazolium nor W-7 (two inhibitors of calmodulin) could modify A 23187-induced SRIF release; another antagonist, chlorpromazine, decreased it by 45%, but only at high concentrations. It should be kept in mind that chlorpromazine, a phenothiazine type of cal modulin-inhibiting agent, can affect a wide variety of en zymes and/or cellular processes [4,9,17,19], including Ca2 +-influx [10,II,13,30]. These effects could explain the chlorpromazine inhibition of ionophore-stimulated SRIF re lease observed in our work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…1-3). While the specificity of these calmodulin antagonists is established under appropriate experimental conditions using soluble proteins (Levin & Weiss, 1979), all the calmodulin antagonists are also known to have nonspecific side effects, including hydrophobic actions, causing perturbation of cell membranes (Seeman, 1972;Landry, Amellal & Ruckstuhl, 1981;Douglas & Nemeth, 1982) and ATP-depletion within the cells (Montecucco et al, 1981;Ruben & Rasmussen, 1981;Corps, Hesketh & Metcalfe, 1982). Under present experimental conditions, several observations argue against the possibility of nonspecific side effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%