Limitations of using micro‐computed tomography to predict bone–implant contact and mechanical fixation

Abstract

Fixation of metallic implants to bone through osseointegration is important in orthopedics and dentistry. Model systems for studying this phenomenon would benefit from a non-destructive imaging modality so that mechanical and morphological endpoints can more readily be examined in the same specimens. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of an automated micro computed tomography (μCT) program for predicting bone-implant contact (BIC) and mechanical fixation strength in a rat model. Femurs in which 1.5 mm diameter titanium implants had been in place for four weeks were either embedded in polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) for preparation of 1 mm thick cross-sectional slabs (16 femurs: 32 slabs) or were used for mechanical implant pull-out testing (n = 18 femurs). All samples were scanned by μCT at 70 kVp with 16 μm voxels and assessed by the manufacturer's software for assessing “osseointegration volume per total volume” (OV/TV). OV/TV measures bone volume per total volume (BV/TV) in a 3-voxel thick ring that by default excludes the 3 voxels immediately adjacent to the implant in order to avoid metal-induced artifacts. The plastic-embedded samples were also analyzed by backscatter scanning electron microscopy (bSEM) to provide a direct comparison of OV/TV with a well-accepted technique for BIC. In μCT images in which the implant was directly embedded within PMMA, there was a zone of elevated attenuation (> 50% of the attenuation value used to segment bone from marrow) which extended 48 μm away from the implant surface. Comparison of the bSEM and μCT images showed high correlations for BV/TV measurements in areas not affected by metal-induced artifacts. In addition for bSEM images, we found that there were high correlations between peri-implant BV/TV within 12 μm of the implant surface and BIC (correlation coefficients ≥ 0.8, p < 0.05). OV/TV as measured on μCT images was not significantly correlated with BIC as measured on the corresponding bSEM images. However, OV/TV was significantly, but weakly, correlated with implant pull-out strength (r=0.401, p=0.049) and energy to failure (r=0.435, p=0.035). Thus, the need for the 48 μm thick exclusion zone in the OV/TV program to avoid metal-induced artifacts with the scanner used in this study means that it is not possible to make bone measurements sufficiently close to the implant surface to obtain an accurate assessment of BIC. Current generation laboratory-based μCT scanners typically have voxel sizes of 6–8 μm or larger which will still not overcome this limitation. Thus, peri-implant bone measurements at these resolutions should only be used as a guide to predict implant fixation and should not be over-interpreted as a measurement of BIC. Newer generation laboratory-based μCT scanners have several improvements including better spatial resolution and x-ray sources and appear to have less severe metal-induced artifacts, but will need appropriate validation as they become available to researchers. Regardless of the μCT scanner being used, we recommend that de...

Is trabecular bone related to primary stability of miniscrews?

“…The material was immersed in saline solution and stored by freezing (220uC). 12 Division of the groups was based on thebone region and the presence of cortical bone ( Table 1). The number of samples was calculated using the sample size data of a previous pilot study (a 5 5%, power of study 5 80%).…”

“…The center of this cylinder, containing the screw, and the bone six voxels adjacent to it (54 mm) were excluded from the VOI in order to reduce the effect of artifact on analyses, a previously reported concern. [12][13][14][15] In the imaging analysis process, a global threshold was used in order to distinguish trabecular bone (white pixels) from the background (empty space, black pixels) by means of a histogram analysis of grayscale images. Histomorphometric parameters such as trabecular thickness, trabecular number, and trabecular separation were automatically calculated for cancellous bone.…”

Bone turnover markers correlate with implant fixation in a rat model using LPS‐doped particles to induced implant loosening

“…The most distal region of interest (ROI III) started from the level of the growth plate. Total volume was defined as the region between the endocortical surface and 48 μm away from the implant surface to avoid metal-induced artifacts in the images 27 . Images were processed by a bone Gaussian filter σ=1.5 support=2 and a titanium Gaussian filter σ=2 support=2.…”

Comparison of bone-implant contact and bone-implant volume between 2D-histological sections and 3D-SRµCT slices

“…Limitations of desktop μCT systems for the investigation of the BIC around metal implants are mainly related to metal-induced artifacts. In a recent μCT study the BIC around titanium wires in rat tibia was correlated to fi ndings of backscattered electron microscopy (Liu et al, 2012). In relation to metal-induced artifacts, the authors found for μCT analysis an exclusion zone of 48 μm from the implant surface, which prevents any suffi cient BIC investigation.…”