1999
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/28.6.562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of the SF-36 in a sample of nursing home residents

Abstract: only one in five nursing home residents met minimal participation criteria, suggesting limited utility of the SF-36 in nursing homes. Reliability and validity characteristics were fairly good. Skewed scores were noted for some SF-36 scales. The utility of the SF-36 may be limited to assessments of subjects with higher cognitive and physical functioning than typical nursing home residents. The SF-36 might benefit from modification for this setting, or by tests of proxy ratings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
42
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
42
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…36 Moreover, the survey presents a low response rate in aged and cognitively impaired individuals. 38 Nonetheless, its usage is currently widespread and it is considered a reliable tool to easily and objectively assess quality of life. 39 This study has some limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Moreover, the survey presents a low response rate in aged and cognitively impaired individuals. 38 Nonetheless, its usage is currently widespread and it is considered a reliable tool to easily and objectively assess quality of life. 39 This study has some limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as already noted by Andresen et al (1999), an MMSE cut-off of 18 or lower, including only those able to make a self-report, amounts to evaluating just one in four nursing home residents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22] As evidenced from many studies among older adults, the SF-36 has demonstrated high reliability (Chronbach's alpha, 0.72 to 0.94), construct validity and convergent validity. [23][24] Both English and Malay versions are available. However, the elderly in the study area had a lower literacy rate, poor reading capacity and some vision problems limiting them to being able to answer self-reported questions correctly.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%