2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2005.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of the National Protocol for Sexual Assault Medical Forensic Examinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method is not very effective because semen spots on nylon and silk materials do not fluoresce, and false positive results can also occur on detergent materials, vaginal secretions, and urine. 18 Examination of seminal fluid by the visual method is as follows; the object or material being examined is examined carefully whether there is a change in color or not. On non-absorbent textiles, if there is seminal fluid, it will appear shiny and translucent, whereas non-absorbent textiles will appear colorless or grayish.…”
Section: Examination Of Seminal Fluid With Ultraviolet (Uv) Visual An...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is not very effective because semen spots on nylon and silk materials do not fluoresce, and false positive results can also occur on detergent materials, vaginal secretions, and urine. 18 Examination of seminal fluid by the visual method is as follows; the object or material being examined is examined carefully whether there is a change in color or not. On non-absorbent textiles, if there is seminal fluid, it will appear shiny and translucent, whereas non-absorbent textiles will appear colorless or grayish.…”
Section: Examination Of Seminal Fluid With Ultraviolet (Uv) Visual An...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2013, OVW created a revised second edition of the SAFE protocol that included updated content and standards of care. Critiques of the 2003 version focused on what medical experts considered to be inadequate guidelines for providing emergency contraception and nonindividualized guidance on offering STI testing for survivors (Lewis-O’Connor et al, 2005). The 2013 version addressed these critiques, added language that focused on the needs of specific populations (individuals lacking English proficiency; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender [LGBT] people; and people with disabilities), and expanded exam timing recommendations and other areas where advances in science impacted clinical practice.…”
Section: Community Responses To Sexual Assault: a Survivor’s Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%