2012
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2206-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of the heavy-baryon expansion as revealed by a pion-mass dispersion relation

Abstract: The chiral expansion of nucleon properties such as mass, magnetic moment, and magnetic polarizability are investigated in the framework of chiral perturbation theory, with and without the heavy-baryon expansion. The analysis makes use of a pion-mass dispersion relation, which is shown to hold in both frameworks. The dispersion relation allows an ultraviolet cutoff to be implemented without compromising the symmetries. After renormalization, the leading-order heavy-baryon loops demonstrate a stronger dependence… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through an examination of the flow of the low-energy coefficients constrained by the lattice QCD results as the regulator parameter, Λ is varied, and with an understanding of the dependence of this flow on the range of pion masses considered in the chiral expansion, one can identify a value of Λ which provides low-energy coefficients independent of the pion mass range considered, and are therefore consistent with the low-energy coefficients of χPT in the PCR [11,13,28,29,49]. A weighted average across studies of the leading-order chiral coefficients of the nucleon mass [28,50] (using PACS-CS results [19]), magnetic moment [11] and the electric charge radius [13] (using QCDSF results [21]) leads to a regulator parameter ofΛ scale ¼ 0.99ð27Þ GeV.…”
Section: Chiral Effective Field Theorymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Through an examination of the flow of the low-energy coefficients constrained by the lattice QCD results as the regulator parameter, Λ is varied, and with an understanding of the dependence of this flow on the range of pion masses considered in the chiral expansion, one can identify a value of Λ which provides low-energy coefficients independent of the pion mass range considered, and are therefore consistent with the low-energy coefficients of χPT in the PCR [11,13,28,29,49]. A weighted average across studies of the leading-order chiral coefficients of the nucleon mass [28,50] (using PACS-CS results [19]), magnetic moment [11] and the electric charge radius [13] (using QCDSF results [21]) leads to a regulator parameter ofΛ scale ¼ 0.99ð27Þ GeV.…”
Section: Chiral Effective Field Theorymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…the order p 3 result for the magnetic polarizability of the nucleon [24,26]). The proton polarizability contribution to the Lamb shift is apparently such a case as well.…”
Section: "Effectiveness" Of Hbχ Pt Vs Bχ Ptmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At least the LO results for nucleon polarizabilities are known to be very different in the two variants of the theory, e.g., the proton magnetic polarizability is (in units of 10 −4 fm 3 ): 1.2 in HBχ PT [20] vs. −1.8 in Bχ PT [21][22][23]. Thus, the LO effect of the pion cloud is paramagnetic in one case and diamagnetic in the other (see [24,25] for more on HBχ PT vs. Bχ PT). Due to these qualitative and quantitative differences it is interesting to examine the Bχ PT predictions for the 2γ contributions to the Lamb shift.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As many recent calculations demonstrate (see, e.g., [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]), Bχ PT shows an improved convergence over the analogous HBχ PT calculations, and, as result, a more "natural" description of the nucleon polarizabilities and Compton scattering processes [32][33][34][35][36]. In this paper, we extend the previous Bχ PT calculations of Lensky et al [35][36][37], done for nucleon polarizabilities appearing in real and forward doubly virtual Compton scattering (RCS and VVCS, respectively), to the case of GPs and VCS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%