1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80426-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of the Glasgow Coma Scale in predicting outcome in children with traumatic brain injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
52
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, our results confirm that GCS represents the most accurate scoring system for evaluating the severity of head injury, although other studies have shown some limitations of GCS in predicting the outcome of traumatized children [30, 31]. The results of our study show that an initial low GCS score, multiple trauma, brain edema and coagulation abnormalities, including delayed aPTT, elevated FDP, low fibrinogen and decreased platelet count, represent important predictors of a poor outcome in children with head injury.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Finally, our results confirm that GCS represents the most accurate scoring system for evaluating the severity of head injury, although other studies have shown some limitations of GCS in predicting the outcome of traumatized children [30, 31]. The results of our study show that an initial low GCS score, multiple trauma, brain edema and coagulation abnormalities, including delayed aPTT, elevated FDP, low fibrinogen and decreased platelet count, represent important predictors of a poor outcome in children with head injury.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The classic definition of mild TBI is a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 13-15, moderate TBI is a GCS of 9-12 and children with GCS scores ^ 8 are considered to have severe TBI [38] . Even with modification for pediatric use, the GCS is not an accurate predictor of cognitive outcome in children [39,40] . The number of lesions on brain computerized tomography as well as the length of time to first purposeful motor response have also been used to predict outcomes and may prove to be more sensitive to pediatric injury [40,41] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) alone is an insensitive way of characterizing the heterogeneous group of pediatric patients with minor head injury, 32,[38][39][40] we created the clinical variable "abnormal mental status." We considered abnormal mental status to be present if the patient had a GCS or pediatric GCS 41 of Ͻ15 or if the patient was confused, somnolent, repetitive, or slow to respond to verbal communication.…”
Section: Variable Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%