2008
DOI: 10.1038/jp.2008.195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of single-channel EEG on the forehead for neonatal seizure detection

Abstract: Objectives: In amplitude-integrated EEG, lead placement across the forehead is convenient, but this location has unknown effects on neonatal seizure (NS) detection sensitivity. This study describes the limits of NS detection by a single forehead EEG channel.Study Design: Records were taken from a digital library of conventional EEGs (CEEGs) with NS, previously characterized at a bicentral channel, C 3 -C 4 . We analyzed electrographic characteristics in a single forehead channel, Fp 3 -Fp 4 .Result: A total of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In [15], it has been reported that the theoretical visibility of a seizure in the central zone is as high as 94%. In another study [16], it has been shown that 46% of seizures are visible in the Fp1, Fp2 zone, which is close to F3, F4 in our montage. No data were found regarding the visibility of seizures in the temporal or occipital zones, and there are no premises to believe that a seizure is more visible in the occipital and temporal zones than in the frontal zone.…”
Section: B Modelling P(e|s)supporting
confidence: 50%
“…In [15], it has been reported that the theoretical visibility of a seizure in the central zone is as high as 94%. In another study [16], it has been shown that 46% of seizures are visible in the Fp1, Fp2 zone, which is close to F3, F4 in our montage. No data were found regarding the visibility of seizures in the temporal or occipital zones, and there are no premises to believe that a seizure is more visible in the occipital and temporal zones than in the frontal zone.…”
Section: B Modelling P(e|s)supporting
confidence: 50%
“…Our study was not primarily focused on postanoxic seizures. Although seizure detection is different depending on the number of electrodes used and their locations, [29][30][31] aEEG, which has the ability to review the raw EEG tracing, has the highest sensitivity for detecting seizures. 32 Mild hypothermia does not influence aEEG, and EEG is not significantly affected at a body temperature of 33 • C. [33][34][35] Benzodiazepines have been described to increase frequency but do not decrease EEG amplitude in frontal brain areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For longer term monitoring including for the detection of seizures, we suggest aEEG ideally with intermittent full array EEG as described in (Shellhaas et al, 2011) to confirm features and seek evidence of seizures not seen in two channel EEG. aEEG electrode position should be at P 3 and P 4 location because it is over the cerebrovascular watershed region at high risk for acquired injury (Hellström-Westas et al, 2008) and more prone to seizure (Wusthoff et al, 2008).…”
Section: Suggestions For Type Of Eeg Recording In Nicusmentioning
confidence: 99%