2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2010.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of self-assembly at temperature 1

Abstract: We prove that if a set X ⊆ Z 2 weakly self-assembles at temperature 1 in a deterministic (Winfree) tile assembly system satisfying a natural condition known as pumpability, then X is a finite union of semi-doubly periodic sets. This shows that only the most simple of infinite shapes and patterns can be constructed using pumpable temperature 1 tile assembly systems, and gives evidence for the thesis that temperature 2 or higher is required to carry out general-purpose computation in a tile assembly system. Fina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…exist in this model. Lower bounds on tile set complexity have also been shown for various shapes (see Rothemund and Winfree (2000); Aggarwal et al (2004); Doty et al (2011)). …”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…exist in this model. Lower bounds on tile set complexity have also been shown for various shapes (see Rothemund and Winfree (2000); Aggarwal et al (2004); Doty et al (2011)). …”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Meunier [12] was able to show the same lower bound for systems permitted to have mismatches under the assumption that the seed tile starts in the lower left of the assembly, and removing this restriction remains open. In a similar vein, Reif and Song [15] have shown that temperature-1 mismatch-free aTAM systems are not computationally universal, while the same problem for systems with mismatches permitted is a notoriously difficult problem that remains open, despite significant efforts [8,7,18,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such conjectures are appealing because the algorithmic design and verification of tile systems [44] as well as lower bounds and impossibility proofs [5,16,31] often rely on reasoning about directed tile systems, which are "better behaved" in many senses than arbitrary tile systems, even those that strictly self-assemble a shape. It would be helpful to begin such arguments with the phrase, "Assume without loss of generality that the tile system is directed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%