1979
DOI: 10.1097/00002480-197902500-00020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of Peritoneal Dialysis (Pd) in the Treatment of Esrd Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The leading cause for these alarming statistics was felt to be underdialysis (10). Other analyses noted similar findings (11,12). In retrospect, a basic problem with IPD is its low efficiency.…”
Section: Chronic Intermittent Peritoneal Dialysis: the Formative Yearssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The leading cause for these alarming statistics was felt to be underdialysis (10). Other analyses noted similar findings (11,12). In retrospect, a basic problem with IPD is its low efficiency.…”
Section: Chronic Intermittent Peritoneal Dialysis: the Formative Yearssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…
Intermittent peritoneal dialysis (IPD) is considered superior to hemodialysis in elderly patients with ad vanced cardiovascular diseases and diabetics with active retinopathy [1], The main disadvantages of IPD are poor dialysis clearances and inadequate sodium balance re sulting in poor blood pressure control and increased mortality on long-term treatment [2,3], The technique of IPD comprises three distinctive periods -influx of dialy sis solution, dwell and outflow of dialysate and ultrafil trate. During dialysate outflow and before the next in flow is completed, dialysis is diminished or completely interrupted.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%