Limitations of methods for measuring the concentration of human genomic DNA and oligonucleotide samples

Abstract

We compared different methods (absorbance, fluorescent dye-binding, and digital PCR) for measuring the concentrations of human genomic DNA from cultured cells and absorbance measurements of a synthetic DNA oligonucleotide. NIST Standard Reference Material (SRM) 2082, a pathlength absorbance standard, was used to benchmark the absorbance measurements done with microvolume spectrophotometers and a microvolume plate reader. Control absorbance values were measured on a high accuracy spectrophotometer and a NIST calibrated pathlength cuvette. Measurements of the human genomic DNA sample were done with several types of fluorescent dye binding assays using different DNA calibrators. The fluorescent dye binding methods gave different results for genomic DNA depending upon the type of DNA calibrator and the fluorescent dye that was used. The human genomic DNA sample was also characterized by using six different droplet digital PCR assays (amplicons located on different chromosomes) to measure the average copy number. Conversion of the digital PCR data to copy numbers was sensitive to the droplet size used for calculations and conversion to mass concentration was dependent upon the molecular weight of the human genome used for the calculations. The results from the different methods were compared and the caveats for each measurement method were discussed.

Multilaboratory Assessment of a New Reference Material for Quality Assurance of Cell-Free Tumor DNA Measurements

“… 27 Even with pristine genomic DNA extracted from cells, in our experience, the quantitation of genomic DNA can be a challenge. 31 Absorbance measurements are straightforward but require pure DNA of sufficient concentration to produce good results. Fluorescence dye binding methods widely used are sensitive but can be biased by contaminants or degraded DNA.…”

“…The dPCR assays used an input of 20 ng of DNA, using the mass of a normal human haploid genome of 3.3 pg, 31 which is equivalent to approximately 6060 genomes. The 0.125% VAF sample would be expected to have approximately seven variant copies.…”

A Simple Approach for Effective Shearing and Reliable Concentration Measurement of Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight DNA

“…The shearing protocol described here is compatible with fast and cheap absorbance measurement [26,27]. If purity ratios indicate that no significant RNA or other contaminant is present, that method can be used.…”

Quantification of DNA through the NanoDrop Spectrophotometer: Methodological Validation Using Standard Reference Material and Sprague Dawley Rat and Human DNA

“…is is especially relevant for evaluating the stability of expression of endogenous control genes (housekeeping) [13]. Finally, He et al [43] pointed out the importance of determining the method with which genomic DNA concentration will be evaluated because the 6…”