1995
DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00336-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of head-up tilt test for evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic interventions in patients with vasovagal syncope: Results of a controlled study of etilefrine versus placebo

Abstract: Oral etilefrine (10 mg three times a day) was not superior to placebo in preventing a positive response to head-up tilt testing. Despite a low statistical power, the high rate of negative response with placebo (50%) suggests that controlled trials are needed to assess the real efficacy of any treatment in patients with vasovagal syncope.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall reproducibility of an initial negative response (85% to 94%) is higher than the reproducibility of an initial positive response (31% to 92%). In addition, data from controlled trials showed that approximately 50% of patients with a baseline positive tilt test became negative when the test was repeated with treatment or with placebo [132][133][134] . Moreover, acute studies were not predictive of the long-term outcome of pacing therapy [135] .…”
Section: Role Of Head-up Tilt Test In Treatment Selection For Vasovagmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overall reproducibility of an initial negative response (85% to 94%) is higher than the reproducibility of an initial positive response (31% to 92%). In addition, data from controlled trials showed that approximately 50% of patients with a baseline positive tilt test became negative when the test was repeated with treatment or with placebo [132][133][134] . Moreover, acute studies were not predictive of the long-term outcome of pacing therapy [135] .…”
Section: Role Of Head-up Tilt Test In Treatment Selection For Vasovagmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, while the results have been satisfactory in uncontrolled trials or shortterm controlled trials [275][276][277][278][279][280][281][282][283][284][285][286][287][288] with few exceptions [132,289] , several long-term placebo-controlled prospective trials have been unable to show a benefit of the active drug over placebo [133,134,[290][291][292][293][294] with one exception [295] . In vasovagal syncope beta-blockers, owing to their negative inotropic effect, have been supposed to lessen the degree of mechanoreceptor activation associated with an abrupt fall in venous return and block the effects of elevated circulating adrenaline, but this theory has not been supported by facts.…”
Section: Vasovagal Syncopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reproducibility varies up to 90% depending on the response [4]. Positive responses decrease with repeated testing irrespective of assigned treatment, with approximately 50% of patients responding to placebo [22]. With respect to QOL, remarkably few studies in the Cochrane meta-analysis reported any measure: 3 of 16 beta-blocker, 2 of 8 alpha-adrenergic agonist; 1 of 2 SSRI, and 1 of 9 pacing studies [4].…”
Section: How Is Effectiveness Defined?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to placebo control, the few available reports have usually failed to find benefit with current therapies. 24,28,42,47,64,65 To date, only atenolol has been shown to be effective in a randomized controlled trial. 25 The issue of the value of empirical treatment was addressed by Natale et al 62 …”
Section: Role Of Tilt-table Testing In Assessing Drug Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%