1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)46009-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of Creatinine as a Filtration Marker in Glomerulopathic Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

16
332
2
26

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(376 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
16
332
2
26
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculated GFRs underestimate true GFRs at borderline levels of creatinine (65). However, once the plasma creatinine level exceeds 1.5-2.0 mg/dl (or 132.6-176.8 moles/liter), the secretory process is effectively saturated, and a change in the plasma creatinine level corresponds to a change in the GFR (64).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Calculated GFRs underestimate true GFRs at borderline levels of creatinine (65). However, once the plasma creatinine level exceeds 1.5-2.0 mg/dl (or 132.6-176.8 moles/liter), the secretory process is effectively saturated, and a change in the plasma creatinine level corresponds to a change in the GFR (64).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, in early renal disease, an initial decline in the GFR may lead to only a slight increase (Յ0.2 mg/dl [or 17.7 moles/liter]) in the concentration of plasma creatinine because of an increase in proximal tubular secretion of creatinine. The net effect is that patients with a true GFR as low as 60-80 ml/minute may still have a plasma creatinine level that is 1.0 mg/dl (or 88.4 moles/liter) (64). Thus, a relatively stable plasma creatinine level in the normal or near-normal range does not necessarily imply that renal function is stable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cystatin equation is not more accurate than creatinine equation, but the combined creatinine-cystatin equation is more precise than either of the two methods used separately [11]. Serum creatinine alone should not be used to assess the GFR or to detect the presence of CKD because it is affected by the GFR and by factors independent of GFR, including age, sex, race, body size, diet, certain drugs, and laboratory analytical methods [12]. According to Myers et al calibration bias and measurement imprecision for serum creatinine have a much larger impact on the uncertainty in estimated GFR when serum creatinine is close to the reference value, which is the relevant range for detecting early CKD [GFR \60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with advanced kidney disease have a creatinine clearance that exceeds the GFR by more than twofold due to enhanced creatinine excretion in renal tubules [9]. Both formulas estimating GFR (Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD) generally overestimates GFR in patients with advanced (GFR 15-29 ml/min) or end-stage renal disease (GFR below 15 ml/min) [10]. In the recent article of Kuan et al [11], MDRD equation was more accurate in predicting GFR in patients with end-stage renal disease (but not yet on dialyses) than Cockcroft-Gault formula.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%