2017
DOI: 10.1007/698_2017_83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of Conventional Drinking Water Technologies in Pollutant Removal

Abstract: This chapter tries to give an overview of the more traditional drinking water treatment from ground and surface waters. Water is treated to meet the objectives of drinking water quality and standards. Water treatment and water quality are therefore closely connected.The objectives for water treatment are to prevent acute diseases by exposure to pathogens, to prevent long-term adverse health effects by exposure to chemicals and micropollutants, and finally

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many efforts have thus been directed toward the removal of organic and inorganic contaminants from water. However, the available traditional water-treatment methods and technologies carry certain limitations including their inability to completely remove certain contaminants to concentration levels that are safe for human consumption and the lack of versatility toward the removal of different classes of contaminants. , There is, thus, a need for the development of novel multifunctional materials with improved properties and a wider applicability for the efficient removal of a broad range of pollutants from water. In this context, the use of nanomaterials for improved contaminant removal by adsorption and/or (photo)­catalytic reactions has been widely advocated, thanks to the their unique electronic, surface, and structural properties. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many efforts have thus been directed toward the removal of organic and inorganic contaminants from water. However, the available traditional water-treatment methods and technologies carry certain limitations including their inability to completely remove certain contaminants to concentration levels that are safe for human consumption and the lack of versatility toward the removal of different classes of contaminants. , There is, thus, a need for the development of novel multifunctional materials with improved properties and a wider applicability for the efficient removal of a broad range of pollutants from water. In this context, the use of nanomaterials for improved contaminant removal by adsorption and/or (photo)­catalytic reactions has been widely advocated, thanks to the their unique electronic, surface, and structural properties. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, contaminants entering water treatment/reuse plants (WTPs) are combined conventional and emerging contaminants. Major contaminants comprise NOM and emerging contaminants (Hofman‐Caris & Hofman, 2017; Levchuk et al, 2018; Taheran et al, 2018). Conventional water treatment units include coagulation/flocculation and filtration for removing suspended solids and disinfection.…”
Section: Applications Of Bac In Water Treatment and Reuse Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To meet the demand, water utilities may have no option and need to produce drinking water from highly contaminated water sources or even treated wastewater. Depth filtration or granular filtration is a main process for water treatment systems throughout the world, and it has been applied to separate conventional suspended particles in water for thousand years (Crittenden et al, 2012;Hofman-Caris & Hofman, 2017). Apart from filtering by the media, biological process can be used to enhance the contaminant removal efficiency of the depth filtration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To prepare them, methods such as aqueous dispersion polymerization , surfactant‐free emulsion polymerization , and heterophase polymerization , have been developed which can produce various interesting morphologies, such as conventional core‐shell , and raspberry‐like , currant‐bun‐like , and snowman‐like structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%