2021
DOI: 10.1111/mam.12248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of acoustic monitoring at wind turbines to evaluate fatality risk of bats

Abstract: Wind turbines (WTs) frequently kill bats worldwide. During environmental impact assessments, consultant ecologists often use automated ultrasonic detectors (AUDs) to estimate the activity and identity of bats in the zone of highest mortality risk at WTs in order to formulate mitigation schemes, such as increased curtailment speeds to prevent casualties. While acknowledging the potential of acoustic monitoring, we evaluate the limitations of AUDs for monitoring bats at WTs and highlight directions for future re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(77 reference statements)
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, our study is not without limitations. First, observing bats via acoustics contain potential biases in that the physics of ultrasonic sound (bat echolocation pulses) change with atmospheric conditions [ 92 ]. This, plus the fact that non-occurrence does not necessarily equate to absence (i.e., detection probability is not reliably 1; [ 93 ]), may over or underestimate probabilities of occurrence depending on the conditions, time of year, among other factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, our study is not without limitations. First, observing bats via acoustics contain potential biases in that the physics of ultrasonic sound (bat echolocation pulses) change with atmospheric conditions [ 92 ]. This, plus the fact that non-occurrence does not necessarily equate to absence (i.e., detection probability is not reliably 1; [ 93 ]), may over or underestimate probabilities of occurrence depending on the conditions, time of year, among other factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although continuous acoustic monitoring of Nathusius’ pipistrelle yields valuable information to elucidate their migration, our study has a few limitations. The first is inherent to acoustic monitoring in general [ 71 , 72 ], which lacks information to derive absolute numbers of individuals from bat detector recordings [ 73 ]. To obtain these absolute numbers, it is necessary to determine the detection probability of echolocation calls of bats, to quantify the size of the monitored area, and to obtain an estimate of a multiplier that translates the number of echolocation calls to an absolute number of individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that only a small portion of the populations of Pipistrelle bats crossed the North Sea during the autumn migration. Acoustic surveys can, however, underestimate the actual activity of bats, as the detection range of the bat detectors is limited, typically between 17 and 35 m for Pipistrellus species, and varies with ambient conditions (temperature and humidity) and recorder settings [ 15 , 16 ]. In addition, bats may be less reliant on echolocation during their flight in an open marine environment and may also make use of visual cues as suggested by Eklöf et al [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recorded data were locally stored on SD memory cards. The detection range by a batcorder, for echolocation calls of the genus Pipistrellus , is between 17 and 35 m, when a threshold of −36 dB is set [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%