1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1386-1425(97)89474-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of ab initio molecular dynamics simulations of simple reactions: F + H2 as a prototype

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several methods exist for calculating forces on the atoms from quantum mechanics and propagating the nuclei classically. Generally, one either carries out an extended Lagrangian (fictitious wave function) dynamics as first proposed by Car and Parrinello 32 or one optimizes the wave function at each time step, staying on the Born−Oppenheimer surface. , Both Parrinello and Gibson et al . provide an in-depth discussion of the merits of both approaches.…”
Section: Calculational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several methods exist for calculating forces on the atoms from quantum mechanics and propagating the nuclei classically. Generally, one either carries out an extended Lagrangian (fictitious wave function) dynamics as first proposed by Car and Parrinello 32 or one optimizes the wave function at each time step, staying on the Born−Oppenheimer surface. , Both Parrinello and Gibson et al . provide an in-depth discussion of the merits of both approaches.…”
Section: Calculational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these limitations, one can use this technique to gain considerable qualitative insight via a representative set of trajectories. AIMD of simple molecular reactions have employed, for example, variants of Hartree−Fock theory [e.g., in the reactions of: F + C 2 H 4 , thymine dimer with its cation, CH 2 O - with H 3 CCl, and H 2 O + H 3 CCl], density functional theory (e.g., HO + NO 2 and a double proton transfer in (HCOOH) 2 ) and complete-active-space self-consistent-field (CASSCF) theory [e.g., F + H 2 → FH + H] for evaluation of the forces on the atoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AIMD has been traditionally limited to simulating relatively small systems (∼1000 atoms) and short times (∼100 ps). , Traditional methods often fail to achieve accurate simulations for multiscale problems, such as various time and space scales involved. Studying chemical reactions, such as adsorption, surface reactions, diffusion, and catalysis, requires simulations that can provide an understanding of underlying processes, which are inherently multiscale.…”
Section: Application Of Mlffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By doing so, researchers can increase the simulation size without compromising simulation accuracy. Moreover, the MLFF overcomes the limitations of AIMD simulations regarding space-time dimensions. …”
Section: Fundamentals Of Mlffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DPD incorporates short-range, soft repulsion potentials while simulating the dynamics of the system, which lends itself to higher time steps than MD [ 40 ]. AIMD may utilize DFT methods or other correlated wavefunction methods such as Møller–Plesset theory or coupled cluster methods to provide a more realistic analysis of the system to more closely resemble experimental conditions [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ]. This can provide even more precise results but can vastly increase the computational cost and significantly limit the practical timescale, up to only a few picoseconds, for a given level of detail [ 33 , 46 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%