2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10825-020-01526-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of ab initio methods to predict the electronic-transport properties of two-dimensional semiconductors: the computational example of 2H-phase transition metal dichalcogenides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We obtained an electron mobility of 154 cm 2 V −1 s −1 when using the LDA exchange-correlation functional. We do not observe much dependence on the exchange-correlation functional used to perform DFT calculations for InSe as compared to the dependence in WS 2 [53], thanks to the reduced role played by the intervalley scattering at low fields.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We obtained an electron mobility of 154 cm 2 V −1 s −1 when using the LDA exchange-correlation functional. We do not observe much dependence on the exchange-correlation functional used to perform DFT calculations for InSe as compared to the dependence in WS 2 [53], thanks to the reduced role played by the intervalley scattering at low fields.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Note that this difference arises only from the choice of the exchange-correlation used to perform the DFT calculations. Nevertheless, the difference in the electron mobility between the two cases discussed above is much smaller than what was found in the case of WS 2 [53]. The weaker dependence on the choice of the exchange-correlation functional of the calculated mobility in InSe, compared to the case of WS 2 , is due to the smaller role played by intervalley scattering in InSe than in WS 2 .…”
Section: Mobility Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The likely reason for the failure of EPW in this test is that in EPW the wavefunctions are rotated as scalars even in the presence of SOC, rather than as spinors as they should (that is, the rotation in spin space is missing). Further investigation of this discrepancy is critical, since the large errors in EPW for the coarse-grid e-ph matrix elements will propagate to the interpolated matrix elements on fine grids, giving incorrect results in calculations including SOC carried out with EPW [46].…”
Section: E-ph Matrix Elements On Coarse Gridsmentioning
confidence: 99%