2019
DOI: 10.1017/jpr.2019.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limit theorems for the fractional nonhomogeneous Poisson process

Abstract: The fractional nonhomogeneous Poisson process was introduced by a time change of the nonhomogeneous Poisson process with the inverse α-stable subordinator. We propose a similar definition for the (nonhomogeneous) fractional compound Poisson process. We give both finite-dimensional and functional limit theorems for the fractional nonhomogeneous Poisson process and the fractional compound Poisson process. The results are derived by using martingale methods, regular variation properties and Anscombe’s theorem. Ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(94 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we have shown in Lemma 3.2 that the operators G and L are continuous. Hence by [4, Corollary 2] we can conclude that p ν (t, x; y) is the unique global solution of ( 23) and (24). Now let us show the uniqueness of the solutions of the backward equation ( 16).…”
Section: Uniqueness Of Strong Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, we have shown in Lemma 3.2 that the operators G and L are continuous. Hence by [4, Corollary 2] we can conclude that p ν (t, x; y) is the unique global solution of ( 23) and (24). Now let us show the uniqueness of the solutions of the backward equation ( 16).…”
Section: Uniqueness Of Strong Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In the discrete case, fractional (time-changed) processes have been widely considered via different approaches. First of all, a fractional version of the Poisson process has been introduced using Mittag-Leffler distributed inter-jump times instead of exponential ones [2,23,24,29,30] (this approach has been also applied to general counting processes [12]). Such process can be also obtained using a fractional differential-difference equations approach [7,8] and by means of a time-change [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We propose a stochastic mortality model incorporating LRD that retains the key advantages of the works of Biffis (2005), Delgado-Vences and Ornelas (2019), and Leonenko et al (2019). More specifically, we maintain the affine nature of Biffis (2005), reflect LRD with fBM as in Delgado-Vences and Ornelas (2019), and offers explicit expressions for some important Fourier-Laplace functional generalizing Leonenko et al (2019) for actuarial valuation. Our model is highly inspired by the affine Volterra processes (Abi Jaber et al, 2019) and hence called the Volterra mortality model.…”
Section: Volterra Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, if τ βi 0 denotes the first time the process X βi ti (s) hits zero, τ βi 0 := inf{s > 0 : X βi ti (s) ≤ 0}, then the ruin probability is the quantity Ram16,KL16,CWW13,LWZ15,KLP18] for ruin probabilities of multidimensional risk models, or [AA10] for a broader treatment of ruin probabilities. Fractional version of compound Poisson processes are also of interest when looking at insurance risk processes, see [LST19]. Similar kinds of questions also appear when looking at barrier options under one-dimensional Markov models, see [MP13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%