1991
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-3530-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limit Theorems for Large Deviations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
238
1
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
238
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. Let us consider the first of relations (2). For p(n) ~< x ~< A2(1 --exp{ ,t/,+_~• p,(n) }) we have from (3) and (4) with en --+ 0 and e', ~ 0, whereas…”
Section: (1)mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof. Let us consider the first of relations (2). For p(n) ~< x ~< A2(1 --exp{ ,t/,+_~• p,(n) }) we have from (3) and (4) with en --+ 0 and e', ~ 0, whereas…”
Section: (1)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…where y = O, in the region (2) in the region 0 ~< x < AVz 1/(2(1+2y)) and necessary when A is replaced A0 in (1), where Ao is defined in Theorem 1. Proof.…”
Section: (1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the normal law the Statulevi~ius condition (S) allows one to use a unified treatment for the sums of independent and dependent summands. Such an approach has proved to be very fruitful (see, for example, [23]). In this section, we shall use one analogue of the condition (S) for the lattice variables from the paper by Ale~kevi~ien6 and Statulevieius [3].…”
Section: (S)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The crucial point in applying the technique developed in [7] Note that the symbol E was introduced by V. Statulevi~ius in the Sixties in a different way in order to represent the mixed cumulants of dependent random variables, see SAULIS and STAXtrcEVI~mS [17].…”
Section: [(T(n)x)'l>jl[(t(~+p)o'"ot(n+l)x)~l>j'c and [(T(n)x)nlmentioning
confidence: 99%