1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf02018372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limit theorems for complete subgraphs of random graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower bounds on the number of cliques in a graph have also been obtained [4,13,14,22,23,24,25]. The number of cliques in a random graph has been studied [3,29,37]. Bounds on the number of cliques in a graph have recently been applied in the analysis of an algorithm for finding small separators [32] and in the enumeration of minor-closed families [28].…”
Section: )Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower bounds on the number of cliques in a graph have also been obtained [4,13,14,22,23,24,25]. The number of cliques in a random graph has been studied [3,29,37]. Bounds on the number of cliques in a graph have recently been applied in the analysis of an algorithm for finding small separators [32] and in the enumeration of minor-closed families [28].…”
Section: )Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(см. [6]- [9]). В следующем пункте мы определим исследуемую нами модель случайных графов, после чего сформулируем основной результат данной работы.…”
Section: постановка задачи и формулировка основного результатаunclassified
“…That is, when p(n) has just exceeded the threshold for the existence of G-subgraphs, Xl, converges to a Poisson distribution if and only if G is strictly balanced. Note that the proofs (see, for example, [3,14]) at some point rely on the fact that all G-subgraphs of Kn,p(n) are nonoverlapping. In other words, if we use X , to denote the number of nonoverlapping G-subgraphs of Kn,p(n), then the above theorem still holds with Xl, replaced by X , .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%