Limit states design of antenna towers

Abstract

The Canadian Standard CAN/CSA-S37-M86 “Antennas, towers and antenna supporting structures” follows a quasi-limit states approach in which the member forces determined for specified loads are multiplied by a unified factor and compared with factored resistances given in CAN3-S16.1-M84. This results in designs basically the same as those resulting from a working stress design with a factor of safety of 5/3. Such structures exhibit a non-linear structural behaviour even under service loads. Thus the effect of ice accretion and direct interaction between wind and ice does not permit the load factors specified in CAN/CSA-S16.1-M89 “Limit states design of steel structures” to be directly applied to antenna supporting structures.In this study, 41 different towers (representing various heights and designed for different ice classes and wind pressures) were analyzed under specified loads and then under a set of factored loads. From the comparison of the design forces in the towers with those calculated according to the existing standard, a set of partial load factors was derived. The new load factors to be used in the 1993 edition of S37 are presented and justified. Key words: antenna towers, guyed towers, ice and wind loads, limit states design, self-supporting towers, working stress design.

Analysis and strengthening of caisson foundations for uplift loads

“…They indicated that the failure rate for guyed telecommunication towers was generally unacceptably high in Canada. Wahba et al (1994) analysed 41 guyed towers to justify the load factors to be used in the CSA S37-94 standard. Selby and Dryburgh (1996) conducted a number of comparative studies to determine the conditions under which the patch load analysis of the CSA S37-94 standard was required for guyed towers.…”