2020
DOI: 10.17323/1609-4514-2020-2-423-436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limit Mixed Hodge Structures of Hyperkähler Manifolds

Abstract: The purpose of this note is to give an account of a well-known folklore result: the Hodge structure on the second cohomology of a compact hyperkähler manifold uniquely determines Hodge structures on all higher cohomology groups. We discuss the precise statement and its proof, which are somewhat difficult to locate in the literature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 3 also offers conceptual explanations to the main results in [9]. As is remarked in [4,Introduction], a recent result of Soldatenkov [12,Theorem 3.8] shows that limiting mixed Hodge structure for type III degenerations is of Hodge-Tate type. In particular, we have…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Theorem 3 also offers conceptual explanations to the main results in [9]. As is remarked in [4,Introduction], a recent result of Soldatenkov [12,Theorem 3.8] shows that limiting mixed Hodge structure for type III degenerations is of Hodge-Tate type. In particular, we have…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…, is precisely [12,Theorem 4.6]. Whereas the original statement requires 2 ( ) ≥ 5 to ensure the existence of an element ∈ 2 ( , Q) with ( ) = 0, in our situation is readily given by the Lagrangian fibration :…”
Section: The Construction Of a Degeneration : M → δ With Logarithmic Monodromymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We shall refer to this as a spin orientation on H . We make both the orientation on M and spin orientation on H as part of our initial data and so we shall only consider hyperkählerian structures that induce the given orientation (but as Soldatenkov [29] has noted, this is in fact automatically the case) and spin orientation (for which the same property might hold-by a theorem of Donaldson this is the case for K 3 surfaces). This spin orientation determines for every positive oriented 2-plane in H R , a positive cone: ⊥ has signature (1, n) and so the set of positive vectors in ⊥ make up an antipodal pair of open cones and the spin orientation singles out one of them.…”
Section: Remark 22 Every η ∈ P N {0}mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We here treat a twistor deformation as if its base (a projective line) were a Shimura variety (which it certainly is not), as this not only is helpful in deriving the Torelli theorem, but also yields a simple way to formulate-and leads to a short way to obtain-a recent result of Soldatenkov [29] (qualified by him as 'folklore') and Green-Kim-Laza-Robles [9] on the period map for the full cohomology of a hyperkählerian manifold. Strictly speaking this last application is independent of the Torelli theorem, but we included it, because this merely comes as a bonus after the ground work done here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%