2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2006.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limit cycle and numerical similations for small and large delays in a predator–prey model with modified Leslie–Gower and Holling-type II schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the same methods as the ones used in [13], for small delay, let − ≃ 1 − , together with (46), the following bifurcation results can be obtained. For large delay, by [13] we have the following results.…”
Section: Hopf Bifurcationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Using the same methods as the ones used in [13], for small delay, let − ≃ 1 − , together with (46), the following bifurcation results can be obtained. For large delay, by [13] we have the following results.…”
Section: Hopf Bifurcationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark. Because the proofs of Theorems 7 and 8 are the same as the proofs of Theorems 3.4 and 3.5 in [13], we omit them here.…”
Section: Hopf Bifurcationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For more works on Leslie-Gower predator-prey model, one could refer to [1,4,7,8,19,21,26,29,30,[34][35][36][37] and the references cited therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%