2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limit analysis of masonry block structures with non-associative frictional joints using linear programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
98
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(29 reference statements)
5
98
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gilbert et al [2006] focus on friction behavior for rigid block structures and also consider two-dimensional problems. Livesley [1978] described the use of linear programming for 2D masonry analysis in 1978, with further work on a small class of 3D structures [Livesley 1992].…”
Section: Design By Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gilbert et al [2006] focus on friction behavior for rigid block structures and also consider two-dimensional problems. Livesley [1978] described the use of linear programming for 2D masonry analysis in 1978, with further work on a small class of 3D structures [Livesley 1992].…”
Section: Design By Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not consider the "sawtooth" friction case described by Gilbert et al [2006]; we assume idealized interfaces where only tangential displacement would occur. Our method identifies structures where a feasible equilibrium solution exists.…”
Section: Block Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They obtained the nonlinear behavior by assuming a set of planes on the element where the frictional response can take place, together with the tensile and compression limit stress. In accordance with the research above on the numerical analysis of masonry walls by the use of micro modeling processes, the models can be divided into groups: 1) one group used the tension cut-off model with the compressive cap model for the mortar joint and elastic behavior of a block [7,13,18], 2) another group used the tension cut-off model without the compressive cap model for the mortar joint for either the elastic-plastic behavior for block masonry [2,16] or the elastic behavior for block masonry [6], and 3) the final group implemented the tension cut-off model with the compressive cap model for mortar joints and the elastic behavior of block masonry [4,8,9,11,15,17]. Therefore, based on these divisions, it is necessary to investigate masonry walls with the use of the tension cut-off model with the compressive cap model and elastic-plastic behavior for block masonry with a simple formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Olivirea and Lourenco developed the model presented in [9] for cyclic loading. The limit analysis of the masonry structure was implemented by modeling nonassociative Coulomb sliding friction [7]. Chaimoon and Attard [4] carried out analysis of a masonry wall with the model introduced in [17]; however, they implemented the model with different slope angles for the linear approximation to the cap model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously stated, the most common idealizations of masonry material behavior are elastic, nonlinear elastic and elastic plastic [9], but in the case of masonry arch bridges and curved structures in general the most diffused approach still remains limit analysis [26]. Several rigid blocks analysis methods have been developed to study the behavior at collapse of masonry arch [27,28,29].…”
Section: Fe-de Modelling For Masonry Arch Bridgesmentioning
confidence: 99%