2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liming does not counteract the influence of long-term fertilization on soil bacterial community structure and its co-occurrence pattern

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…promote both co-operation and competition in bacterial networks. Accordingly, microbial networks were found to be less complex under limed and N-fertilized conditions than under control conditions [52]. In this study, NO 3 − fertilization resulted in less complex bacterial networks in all soil compartments, probably because NO 3 − application provided more favorable conditions in terms of higher soil pH and N nutrition.…”
Section: Nitrogen Form and Maize Rhizosphere In Uenced Bacterial Co-omentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…promote both co-operation and competition in bacterial networks. Accordingly, microbial networks were found to be less complex under limed and N-fertilized conditions than under control conditions [52]. In this study, NO 3 − fertilization resulted in less complex bacterial networks in all soil compartments, probably because NO 3 − application provided more favorable conditions in terms of higher soil pH and N nutrition.…”
Section: Nitrogen Form and Maize Rhizosphere In Uenced Bacterial Co-omentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Although the NH 4 + treatment provided su cient N in the soil environment, the soil pH was decreased to 4.5 due to NH 4 + absorption and nitri cation. This may have enhanced niche sharing and intensi ed competition and cooperation among bacterial taxa [52]. The bacterial networks were more complex in the maize root zone and its adjacent soil compartments (0.5-1 cm) than in the outer compartments in both the NH 4 + and NO 3 − treatments, indicative of more complex bacterial networks in the maize rhizosphere than in bulk soil.…”
Section: Nitrogen Form and Maize Rhizosphere In Uenced Bacterial Co-omentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In particular, significant relationships suggested that the soil pH determined the topological features of the co-occurrence network for soil microbiota in the Tibetan alpine grasslands. One possible explanation for this is that soil pH could affect soil microbial interactions via regulating the availability of soil nutrients [45,46]. Based on the strong relationships between soil pH versus SOM, TN, AN (NH 4 + and NO 3 − ), TP, and AP, soil pH was likely to influence the interactions among soil bacterial and archaeal taxa via changing the C, P, and N availability in the alpine grasslands (Additional file 2: Fig S10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancy in driving factors for environmental selection from soils to leaves suggests that divergent environmental selection processes are active in the compartments. It is not surprising to find that soil pH, the best predictor of soil bacterial and archaeal community composition across global [46], regional [47] and local scales [48], is an important driver for microbiomes in both the rhizosphere and bulk soil. In addition to soil pH, soil organic carbon quality and quantity and nitrogen and phosphorus availability also have notable influences on soil microbial community structure [49].…”
Section: Community Assembly Mechanisms Of C Sinensis Microbiomes Fromentioning
confidence: 99%