Liminality and Mental Health Court Diversion: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Offender Experiences: Table 1

Nordberg, Anne

doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcu104

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…One patient said; "And then, that you maybe for your own safety and the safety of others have to be locked in on the ward... it is done for my own good" [40]. Furthermore, patients believed that treatment was required for recovery [41], and legally mandated treatment was described as a defining life experience [44].…”

Section: Recognition That Treatment/admission Was Beneficial (N = 12)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Experiences with legally mandated treatment in patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review of qualitative studies

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Patients with severe mental illness, including schizophrenia, may be legally mandated to undergo psychiatric treatment. Patients’ experiences in these situations are not well characterized. This systematic review of qualitative studies aims to describe the experiences of patients with schizophrenia and related disorders who have undergone legally mandated treatment. Methods: Four bibliographic databases were searched: CINAHL Plus (1981–2019), EMBASE (1947–2019), MEDLINE (1946–2019), and PsycINFO (1806–2019). These databases were searched for keywords, text words, and medical subject headings related to schizophrenia, legally mandated treatment and patient experience. The reference lists of included studies and systematic reviews were also investigated. The identified titles and abstracts were reviewed for study inclusion. A thematic analysis was completed for the synthesis of positive and negative aspects of legally mandated treatment. Results: A total of 4,008 citations were identified. Eighteen studies were included in the final synthesis. For the thematic analysis, results were collated under two broad themes; positive patient experiences and negative patient experiences. Patients were satisfied when their autonomy was respected, and dissatisfied when it was not. Patients often retrospectively recognized that their treatment was beneficial. Furthermore, negative aspects of the treatment included deficits in communication and a lack of information. Conclusions: Intervention research has historically focused on clinical outcomes and the quantitative aspects of treatment. Thus, this study provides insight into the qualitative aspects of patients’ experiences with legally mandated treatment. Recognizing these opinions and experiences can lead to better attitudes toward treatment for patients with schizophrenia and related psychiatric illnesses.

show abstract

Section: Recognition That Treatment/admission Was Beneficial (N = 12)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Experiences with legally mandated treatment in patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review of qualitative studies

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The phenomenological branch has been formally reported elsewhere (Nordberg, 2014). I interviewed nine people with SMI who had successfully completed TMHC diversion and used an interpretative phenomenological analytic approach to explore the meaning of the MHC experience among participants (Nordberg, 2014).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…My phenomenological analysis revealed a variety of self-governance techniques that ranged from traditional pharmaceutical interventions to novel uses of AA meetings to cope with auditory hallucinations associated with schizophrenia (Nordberg, 2014). My interviews with TMHC graduates demonstrated great variation in success and reflect in some detail the tensions among TMHC participants between processes that help some people with SMI while failing others.…”

Section: A U T H O R C O P Ymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Therapeutic governmentality and biopower in a Canadian mental health court

Nordberg

2015

BioSocieties

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mental health courts (MHCs) are a response to the structural violence experienced by people with severe mental illness (SMI) involved in the criminal justice system. My ethnographic research of an MHC in urban Canada serves as the foundation for a discussion of court processes that are an example of biopower. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate how strategies for intervention in the name of life and health, truth discourses and forms of self-governance operate among criminal justice-involved individuals with SMI. This study reveals the tensions between the intense forensic gaze and invisibility and between treatment strategies that are beneficial for some people with SMI yet ultimately coercive and oppressive. The governance of this population is discussed, as well as what happens to people who fail or refuse to self-govern as the court compels them.

show abstract

“…A toda essa complexidade do PS, delimitamos, durante a análise indutiva, o atributo processo de liminaridade (PL). Este é um conceito antropológico contextualizado em diferentes perspectivas e bastante abordado nos estudos com doenças crônicas, por exemplo, com pacientes com esquizofrenia, artrite, fadiga crônica e encefalomielite miálgica, na saúde mental, com cuidadores de pacientes com doença crônica, HIV/AIDS, doença crônica renal, dentre outros, sempre se reportando à liminaridade como a ambiguidade de ser ou estar entre algo (MURPHY et al,1988;PINDER, 1995;GIBBONS;ROSS;BEVANS, 2014;BRUCE et al, 2014;KEVERN, 2015;NORDBERG, 2015;BROWN;HUSZAR;CHAPMAN, 2017). No contexto do câncer, diversos autores têm se debruçado em estudá-lo (NAVON;MORAG, 2004;BLOWS et al, 2012;BRUCE et al, 2014;ADORNO, 2015; TRUSSON; PILNICK, ROY, 2016) e, ao longo do tempo, diferentes definições já foram delineadas.…”

Section: Processo De Liminaridadeunclassified

Aspectos conceituais teóricos e subjetivos da sobrevivência ao câncer: contribuições para a enfermagem oncológica

Oliveira¹,

Zago²

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The progress in the early diagnosis of cancer and therapies, as well as the longevity and population growth remit to an increased number of cancer survivors around the world, giving rise to a new term, that of cancer survivorship (CS). The general objective in this study was to analyze the concept of CS in the health literature and among adult and/or elderly patients diagnosed with the disease. To achieve this objective, we elaborated four specific objectives, which made us organize the dissertation in three main phases. The objective of the first phase is to analyze the concept of CS presented in the health literature, according to Rodgers' evolutionary model of concept analysis. This model is arranged in six steps, recommending the analysis of the studies surveyed by means of inductive thematic analysis and their interpretation according to the theoretical framework of the culture concept. As a result, we obtained the components of the concept, which help us understand it. These are: antecedentbeing diagnosed with cancer; consequentquality of life of cancer survivors (StC) and personal growth; attributesliminality process and culturally congruent care; substitute terms-StC, long-term survival and individuals living after the cancer diagnosis, and finally the related termscancer survival and rehabilitation. For the second phase, the purpose was to apprehend the meanings attributed to being StC among the patients, as well as to describe the meanings adult and elderly patients attribute to the CS concept through narrative syntheses. Thus, we built a qualitative study, using the narrative method and the reference framework of medical anthropology. We held semistructured interviews with 14 participants diagnosed with different types of urological cancer, male and female, adult and elderly, with at least three months post-treatment. After transcribing the data, they were analyzed according to inductive thematic analysis and two narrative syntheses were elaborated, the first being the dualities of life after the treatment; from loss of self-control, the uncertainty of the disease relapse to optimism and hope. In this synthesis, we discuss the survivor's experience with the disease, the loss of control the disease triggers and the consequent personal growth and gaining of optimism despite the circumstances experienced. The second synthesis is entitled: Who am I? Am I a cancer survivor? Self-reflection on the identity after the primary cancer treatment. In this synthesis, we apprehend the participants' reflection on how they see themselves and attribute meanings to being ill, cured, victim and mainly StC. These two narrative syntheses allowed us to describe and get closer to the meanings attributed to CS. The third phase was developed in three topics, the first being the comparison between the results of phase one and phase two, complemented with the importance of oncology nursing in care for StC and a reflection on the current public health policies. This dissertation updates the concept of CS and offers new perspectiv...

show abstract

Liminality and Mental Health Court Diversion: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Offender Experiences: Table 1

Cited by 7 publications

References 25 publications

Experiences with legally mandated treatment in patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review of qualitative studies

Experiences with legally mandated treatment in patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review of qualitative studies

Therapeutic governmentality and biopower in a Canadian mental health court

Aspectos conceituais teóricos e subjetivos da sobrevivência ao câncer: contribuições para a enfermagem oncológica

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About