1982
DOI: 10.1002/ep.670010113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limestone dissolution in stack gas desulfurization. A mass‐transfer model is shown to predict the the measured dissolution rates with less than 30% error

Abstract: ZfJ = oil-layer diffusion length, cm Greek Letters a P e = temperature, "C Y = activity coefficient P = density, lb/ft3 P = density, g/cm3 0 = oxygen transfer correction factor = viscosity, g/cm . sec -= rotational speed of turbine impeller, rad/sec Subscripts air c H2O g i j L 0 2 P T To1 W = air = convective = water = hazardous component i = hazardous component j = liquid = oxygen = soil particle = turbulent = toluene = waste = gd5 LITERATURE CITED 1. Cohen, Y., W.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on a shrinking core model, they proposed an empirical formulation that correlated limestone dissolution rates with its particle size. Toprac and Rochelle noted that initial particle size distribution had a significant effect, whereas the type of limestone had almost no effect. Gao et al measured the dissolution rate of limestone in the presence of sulfite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a shrinking core model, they proposed an empirical formulation that correlated limestone dissolution rates with its particle size. Toprac and Rochelle noted that initial particle size distribution had a significant effect, whereas the type of limestone had almost no effect. Gao et al measured the dissolution rate of limestone in the presence of sulfite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case it is important to know the reactivity of produced calcium carbonate in the FGD process. Understanding of the limestone dissolution/reaction kinetics of the FGD processes has attracted quite serious attention (Siagi and Mbarawa, 2009;Toprac and Rochelle, 1982;De Blasio et al, 2012;Ye and Bjerle, 1994;Ahlbeck et al, 1993;Ahlbeck et al, 1995;Pepe, 2001;Ukawa et al, 1993;Chan and Rochelle, 1982;Shih et al, 2000). It is assumed that limestone dissolution is the rate controlling step of SO 2 absorption processes (Siagi and Mbarawa, 2009;Pepe, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been conducted in order to model the reactivity of limestone in these conditions. Often, the acidic conditions have been simulated by using HCl solutions [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Additionally, a common method is to carry out the experiments at conditions that simulate the steady state industrial process and, therefore, the pH is maintained approximately constant [9,18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%