The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.200800625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limestone Attrition under Simulated Oxyfiring Fluidized‐Bed Combustion Conditions

Abstract: Limestone attrition by surface wear was studied during the flue gas desulfurization under simulated fluidized-bed (FB) oxyfiring conditions and hindered calcination. Bench-scale experimental tests were carried out using well-established techniques previously developed for the characterization of sulfation and attrition of sorbents in air-blown atmospheric FB combustors. The experimental limestone conversion and attrition results were compared with those previously obtained with the same limestone under simulat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transfer from the L to the SL phase, driven by sulfation. It has been discussed ,, that sorbent sulfation in FB combustors takes place along two subsequent stages (Figure ): stage I , associated with the initial buildup of a sulfate-rich particle shell, and stage II , associated with a slower attrition-enhanced sulfation promoted by continuous removal of the sulfated material from the particle surface. Assuming that the contribution to SO 2 capture given by stage II is negligible, the global sulfation kinetic constant used in the model has been estimated by averaging over the time the sulfation rate in stage I measured during differential FB experiments …”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transfer from the L to the SL phase, driven by sulfation. It has been discussed ,, that sorbent sulfation in FB combustors takes place along two subsequent stages (Figure ): stage I , associated with the initial buildup of a sulfate-rich particle shell, and stage II , associated with a slower attrition-enhanced sulfation promoted by continuous removal of the sulfated material from the particle surface. Assuming that the contribution to SO 2 capture given by stage II is negligible, the global sulfation kinetic constant used in the model has been estimated by averaging over the time the sulfation rate in stage I measured during differential FB experiments …”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%