Abstract:Applying lime is a fundamental practice for abating acidity in highly weathered soil, but better management strategies for no-till systems are needed to prevent surface pH elevation with little to no subsurface effects. This study was conducted to quantify chemical changes within the soil profile in response to lime and straw applications under both greenhouse and field conditions. Four controlled environment experiments (soil columns) and one field study were conducted on soils classified as Rhodic Hapludox a… Show more
“…As a result, aluminum concentration was only high in the B1 horizon of the non-incorporated pots, where pH remained consistently low (Table 1). These results supports the findings of Nunes et al (2019) that incorporation is required to change soil pH at depth. Australian soils can be highly acidic to depths of 40 to 100 cm, naturally or due to agronomic practices (Isbell 2016).…”
Section: Lime and Soil Incorporation In Controlled Conditionssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…An international review of liming experiments indicated that the application method of lime (surface, plow, subsoiling) did not affect the change in soil pH achieved through liming, although the review did not specifically consider varying soil depths (Li et al 2019). Rainfall can be low in Australian agricultural areas, and both field and pot studies indicate that in weathered soils, lime will not move farther than 2.5 cm through the soil profile without incorporation (Nunes et al 2019). Lime incorporation through cultivation will bury weed seed, changing the emergence patterns of the weed in subsequent seasons (Chauhan et al 2006a).…”
Estimates indicate that 30% of land surface globally is affected by soil acidity, influencing agricultural production. Application of lime increases soil pH and improves crop growth. We tested the hypothesis that liming will reduce rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaudin) growth by improving the competitive ability of the crop. Experiments at Merredin and Wongan Hills in Western Australia indicated that application of lime in previous years reduced L. rigidum density, biomass, and seed production in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crops in 2018. At Merredin, L. rigidum seed production in 2018 was reduced from 9,390 to 2,820 seeds m−2, and wheat tiller number and yield was increased, following lime application of 0 to 6,000 kg ha−1 in 2016. At Wongan Hills, lime application of 4,000 kg ha−1 in 1994 reduced seed production in the 2018 wheat crop from 4,708 to 1,610 seeds m−2, and application of 3,000 kg ha−1 of lime in 2014 reduced seed production from 3,959 to 921 seeds m−2 in 2018. Again, lime increased wheat tiller number, but not yield. A screen house experiment (in controlled conditions) indicated that lime application increased the initial growth of both L. rigidum and wheat seedlings. This supports the conclusion that reduced L. rigidum growth and seed production in the field resulted from increased competitive ability of the crop, rather than any direct and detrimental impact of lime on L. rigidum growth. Incorporation of lime reduced initial emergence of L. rigidum in controlled conditions, with L. rigidum seeds at a uniform depth, and in the field experiments in situations of high weed density, with seeds buried by the incorporation process. Nationally, the revenue loss from residual L. rigidum in crop is A$93 million per year. The current research confirms that application of lime will increase the competitive ability of crops growing in regions with acidic soils.
“…As a result, aluminum concentration was only high in the B1 horizon of the non-incorporated pots, where pH remained consistently low (Table 1). These results supports the findings of Nunes et al (2019) that incorporation is required to change soil pH at depth. Australian soils can be highly acidic to depths of 40 to 100 cm, naturally or due to agronomic practices (Isbell 2016).…”
Section: Lime and Soil Incorporation In Controlled Conditionssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…An international review of liming experiments indicated that the application method of lime (surface, plow, subsoiling) did not affect the change in soil pH achieved through liming, although the review did not specifically consider varying soil depths (Li et al 2019). Rainfall can be low in Australian agricultural areas, and both field and pot studies indicate that in weathered soils, lime will not move farther than 2.5 cm through the soil profile without incorporation (Nunes et al 2019). Lime incorporation through cultivation will bury weed seed, changing the emergence patterns of the weed in subsequent seasons (Chauhan et al 2006a).…”
Estimates indicate that 30% of land surface globally is affected by soil acidity, influencing agricultural production. Application of lime increases soil pH and improves crop growth. We tested the hypothesis that liming will reduce rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaudin) growth by improving the competitive ability of the crop. Experiments at Merredin and Wongan Hills in Western Australia indicated that application of lime in previous years reduced L. rigidum density, biomass, and seed production in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crops in 2018. At Merredin, L. rigidum seed production in 2018 was reduced from 9,390 to 2,820 seeds m−2, and wheat tiller number and yield was increased, following lime application of 0 to 6,000 kg ha−1 in 2016. At Wongan Hills, lime application of 4,000 kg ha−1 in 1994 reduced seed production in the 2018 wheat crop from 4,708 to 1,610 seeds m−2, and application of 3,000 kg ha−1 of lime in 2014 reduced seed production from 3,959 to 921 seeds m−2 in 2018. Again, lime increased wheat tiller number, but not yield. A screen house experiment (in controlled conditions) indicated that lime application increased the initial growth of both L. rigidum and wheat seedlings. This supports the conclusion that reduced L. rigidum growth and seed production in the field resulted from increased competitive ability of the crop, rather than any direct and detrimental impact of lime on L. rigidum growth. Incorporation of lime reduced initial emergence of L. rigidum in controlled conditions, with L. rigidum seeds at a uniform depth, and in the field experiments in situations of high weed density, with seeds buried by the incorporation process. Nationally, the revenue loss from residual L. rigidum in crop is A$93 million per year. The current research confirms that application of lime will increase the competitive ability of crops growing in regions with acidic soils.
“…With more-precise sampling from the soil pit face, the increase in soil pH in our study was restricted to the top 0.15 m depth ( Fig. 2e and f), similar to that measured by Nunes et al (2019). Unlimed control plots were acidified at all sampling depths at 0.010 pH units per year.…”
Section: Restricted Vertical Movement Of Alkali In Long-term Lime Expsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…There was no evidence of increasing soil solution pH below 0.20 m depth, contrary to the evidence reported by Whitten (2002) in which a much higher watering regime was applied compared with our experiment. Our experiment suggests that the potential to treat subsurface soil acidity by surface incorporation of high rates (3-6 Mg ha -1 ) of lime is limited and likely only to be effective in less-acidic topsoil (pH > 5) in higher rainfall regions, but the rate of improvement in pH is slow as measured by Nunes et al (2019), and slower than that measured by Whitten (2002). This prompted us to test whether strategic deep tillage is a better solution for deep incorporation of lime for rapid amelioration of subsurface soil acidity.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Vertical Movement Of Alkali In Soil Columnsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…More recent literature suggests that, under both field and controlled environment conditions, the significant increase in soil pH is restricted to the few centimetres below the liming depth (Li et al 2019;Nunes et al 2019). Some reports indicate that the rate of the vertical movement of alkalinity from lime is affected by soil characteristics (for example, initial soil pH, soil organic carbon (OC) and soil texture), climate, time, application rate and lime quality parameters (Conyers and Scott 1989;Whitten 2002;Caires et al 2005).…”
Conventional surface-application of agricultural lime takes many years to increase pH deeper in the soil profile, which is a barrier to increased adoption of liming. We conducted a series of experiments to measure the rate of vertical movement of alkali and identify the factors that determine this movement into the subsurface, to evaluate the feasibility of ameliorating acidic subsurface soil using residual (undissolved) lime (CaCO 3) at Wongan Hills (30.858S, 116.748E) and Merredin (31.488S, 118.218E) and to test whether deep tillage and lime incorporation can significantly speed up the amelioration of subsurface soil acidity at Kalannie (30.428S, 117.298E). Multiple applications of lime to the surface of the soil at higher rates (total 6-8.5 Mg ha-1) significantly increased subsurface soil pH but only in the 0.10-0.20 m depth by 0.049 pH units per year over 10-24 years. A large proportion of the surface-applied lime was stratified in the top few centimetres of the soil and incorporation of this undissolved lime with a rotary hoe to a depth of 0.25 m significantly increased soil pH (by 0.63 units) within a year in the Wongan Hills field experiment. Deep incorporation of 6 Mg ha-1 lime to a depth of 0.45 m through excavation and spading with a small rotary hoe also increased soil pH by more than a unit and decreased Al concentration to below the toxic level within two months in the Kalannie experiment, allowing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants to produce root systems up to 0.59 m deep compared with 0.26 m for the control. Our soil column leaching experiment indicated that surface incorporation of lime in higher rainfall regions can be useful to treat subsurface soil acidity but that the rate of improvement in subsurface pH was slow. Therefore, deeper incorporation of lime using cost-effective strategic deep tillage is likely to be necessary.
Highly‐weathered soils have low native fertility; thus, optimum nutrient management is critical, especially for a high‐input crop such as corn (Zea mays). Field studies were established in Plains and Tifton, GA (USA) to assess secondary nutrient (SN; Mg, Ca, and S) and micronutrient (MN; B, Zn, Mn, Fe, Cu, and Mo) application effects on corn fertilized with primary nutrients (PN; N, P, and K) to achieve 12.5 Mg ha−1 (low) and 25.1 Mg ha−1 (high) yields. Both Plains and Tifton have Ultisol soil. However, the Tifton soil has a 30‐cm top sandy layer, and the Plains soil has no top sandy layer. Differences in corn nutrient concentrations were observed at the V5‐V7 stage but not in biomass accumulation. The 12.5 Mg ha−1 target grain yield from applying the low PN was exceeded at both locations (by 19.0‐26.6% in Plains and 6.3‐19.7% in Tifton), irrespective of the SN or MN application. However, the 25.1 Mg ha−1 target grain yield from applying the high PN rate was not achieved, with yields of 16.9‐17.7 Mg ha−1 in Plains and 15.7‐17.1 Mg ha−1 in Tifton obtained. The SN and/or MN application increased corn yield (by 2.3‐13.6%) across all conditions, but the differences were statistically significant under just the low PN rate in Tifton. Overall, the results showed that SN and MN could be yield‐limiting factors of corn in the Ultisol soils tested in the study, and also 12.5 Mg ha−1 corn yield can be achieved with lower PN rates than currently recommended.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.