2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limbic response to psychosocial stress in schizotypy: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is some evidence of an association between altered dopaminergic neurotransmission and psychometrically identified schizotypy (Woodward et al, 2011), findings are less consistent than in frank psychosis, possibly due to high heterogeneity in the experimental designs and methods used (Mohr & Ettinger, 2014). Moreover, elevated stress‐induced dopamine release as measured with [ 11 C]raclopride PET (Soliman et al, 2008) and increased functional activation as measured with functional MRI (Soliman et al, 2011) in striatal regions in schizotypy has only been observed in relation to negative schizotypal features (reflecting the interpersonal dimension of schizotypy, thought to mirror negative symptoms in schizophrenia), but not in relation to positive schizotypy (reflecting the cognitive‐perception dimension of schizotypy, thought to mirror positive symptoms in schizophrenia). Further research examining the relative contributions of hyperperfusion at different nodes of a hippocampal–striatal–midbrain circuit along a psychosis continuum (psychosis, CHR, and HS), combined with measurements of the different neurotransmitter systems involved (i.e., GABA, glutamate, and dopamine), may provide substantial insights into the neurobiology of risk and resilience for psychiatric disorders (Pantelis & Bartholomeusz, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is some evidence of an association between altered dopaminergic neurotransmission and psychometrically identified schizotypy (Woodward et al, 2011), findings are less consistent than in frank psychosis, possibly due to high heterogeneity in the experimental designs and methods used (Mohr & Ettinger, 2014). Moreover, elevated stress‐induced dopamine release as measured with [ 11 C]raclopride PET (Soliman et al, 2008) and increased functional activation as measured with functional MRI (Soliman et al, 2011) in striatal regions in schizotypy has only been observed in relation to negative schizotypal features (reflecting the interpersonal dimension of schizotypy, thought to mirror negative symptoms in schizophrenia), but not in relation to positive schizotypy (reflecting the cognitive‐perception dimension of schizotypy, thought to mirror positive symptoms in schizophrenia). Further research examining the relative contributions of hyperperfusion at different nodes of a hippocampal–striatal–midbrain circuit along a psychosis continuum (psychosis, CHR, and HS), combined with measurements of the different neurotransmitter systems involved (i.e., GABA, glutamate, and dopamine), may provide substantial insights into the neurobiology of risk and resilience for psychiatric disorders (Pantelis & Bartholomeusz, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observation that stress is a possible risk factor for schizophrenia (156) has led to an fMRI study of the neuronal response to stress in participants with high schizotypy (157). Differences in striatal and limbic activation patterns were found in participants with negative schizotypy in comparison to controls.…”
Section: Genetic Cognitive and Neurobiological Studies Of Schizotypmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that in response to social rejection activity in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), right superior frontal gyrus, and left ventral prefrontal cortex increased and decreased in the low- vs. high-schizotypy group, respectively [52]. Using fMRI, Soliman et al examined the activity of striatal, cortical, and limbic regions to laboratory induced psychological stress, and demonstrated that non-clinical participants scoring high on Physical Anhedonia (a facet of Negative schizotypy) exhibited greater stress-induced deactivation of striatal and limbic regions compared to control participants and those scoring high on Perceptual Aberration (a facet of Positive schizotypy) [53]. Additionally, across all participants, Physical Anhedonia was correlated with stress-associated striatal deactivation [53].…”
Section: Social/interpersonal and Affective Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using fMRI, Soliman et al examined the activity of striatal, cortical, and limbic regions to laboratory induced psychological stress, and demonstrated that non-clinical participants scoring high on Physical Anhedonia (a facet of Negative schizotypy) exhibited greater stress-induced deactivation of striatal and limbic regions compared to control participants and those scoring high on Perceptual Aberration (a facet of Positive schizotypy) [53]. Additionally, across all participants, Physical Anhedonia was correlated with stress-associated striatal deactivation [53]. Interestingly, as described in the Neurochemistry section, this same group observed in a separate study that participants scoring high for Physical Anhedonia exhibited greater stress-induced release of presynaptic dopamine, compared to controls and participants with high levels of Perceptual Aberrations [54].…”
Section: Social/interpersonal and Affective Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%