1972
DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6773(72)80176-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limbic lesions and control of the internal and external environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
50
1

Year Published

1973
1973
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
9
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Scalia & Winans, 1975) may further clarify the neuroanatomical substrates of baitshyness phenomena . Further studies of the amygdala are of additional importance since it is the only structure studied to date which has been implicated in the disruption of both baitshyness acquisition (Elkins, 1970;Kemble & Nagle, 1973;McGowan, Hankins, & Garcia, 1972;Nachman & Ashe, 1974;Rolls & Rolls, 1973) and retention (Nachman & Ashe, 1974). Memory of preoperatively conditioned flavor aversions is not attenuated by lesions of area postrema (Branca, Campbell, & Margules, 1972), the lateral hypothalamus (Schwartz & Teitelbaum, 1974), or ventromedial hypothalamus (Gold & Proulx, 1972).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scalia & Winans, 1975) may further clarify the neuroanatomical substrates of baitshyness phenomena . Further studies of the amygdala are of additional importance since it is the only structure studied to date which has been implicated in the disruption of both baitshyness acquisition (Elkins, 1970;Kemble & Nagle, 1973;McGowan, Hankins, & Garcia, 1972;Nachman & Ashe, 1974;Rolls & Rolls, 1973) and retention (Nachman & Ashe, 1974). Memory of preoperatively conditioned flavor aversions is not attenuated by lesions of area postrema (Branca, Campbell, & Margules, 1972), the lateral hypothalamus (Schwartz & Teitelbaum, 1974), or ventromedial hypothalamus (Gold & Proulx, 1972).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amygdaloid damage has been shown to interfere with response suppression [25], to prevent the formation of induced taste aversion [16,21,24], to attenuate emotional and/or emotional reactions in a number of situations [8,11,15], to eliminate self-punitive behavior [27], to produce significant learning deficits for passive avoidance conditioning [34] and to induce an increase in sniffing, rearing and exploration [6,37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is indicated by the fact that the present procedures produced a 44% reduction in eating the novel food on the part of Group H animals which is similar to the magnitude of previous taste aversions for novel liquids. McGowan, Hankins, & Garcia (1972) found that rats with ventral hippocampal lesions reduced their intake of a saccharin solution by approximately 40% after it was paired with internal malaise and that rats with dorsal hippocampal lesions reduced their intake of the same solution by approximately 30%. In addition, Murphy and Brown (I974) demonstrated a learned taste aversion to sucrose with rats with bilateral hippocampal lesions reducing their intake by 60%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attention has recently been given to the effects of hippocampal lesions on learned taste aversions (Best & Orr, 1973: McGowan, Hankins, & Garcia, 1972: Murphy & Brown, 1974. In all of the studies which examined this effect, the taste of a solution was the CS which was paired with a noxious UCS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%