2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limb lengthening with fully implantable magnetically actuated mechanical nails (PHENIX®)—Preliminary results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Phenix and PRECICE nails are magnetically motorised rods capable of lengthening and shortening long bones [20,25]. Rod-length increase or decrease occurs in response to a portable external remote controller (ERC) placed superficially on the skin [31].…”
Section: Internal Lengthening Rodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Phenix and PRECICE nails are magnetically motorised rods capable of lengthening and shortening long bones [20,25]. Rod-length increase or decrease occurs in response to a portable external remote controller (ERC) placed superficially on the skin [31].…”
Section: Internal Lengthening Rodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satisfactory preliminary outcomes were reported in Europe with Phenix M2 nail system, which has both lengthening and shortening modes. Researchers used the shortening option on one occasion for distraction-induced neurological deficit of the foot, which recovered eventually [25]. Likewise, shortening may help ameliorate other distraction-related complications, such as joint subluxation and progressive soft tissue contractures.…”
Section: Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, patient comfort and joint mobility have increased (1-6). On the other hand, the general risk of incomplete bone regeneration and pseudoarthrosis with the associated risk of material failure and falling short of the lengthening goal persists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the general risk of incomplete bone regeneration and pseudoarthrosis with the associated risk of material failure and falling short of the lengthening goal persists. Secondary surgical procedures to achieve healing and/or the lengthening goal again put the advantages of the internal implantation into perspective (6, 7). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical results are highly encouraging, but lengthening failures and most particularly excessively rapid gains in length have been reported [28]. The current trend is the development of implants allowing passive lengthening, with either motorized (Fitbone nail) or magnetic (Phenix and Precice nails) devices, but these fairly rare and expensive techniques are still in the evaluation phase [29,30]. In the postinfectious context, a prior study of the medullary cavity will always be necessary, because modifications in its diameter can make nailing difficult, as will an assessment of the risk of reactivating infection, given the risk of pandiaphysitis with material that has an uncertain prognosis, and an evaluation of the mobility, quality (chondrolysis?…”
Section: Lateral Epiphysiodesismentioning
confidence: 99%