2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-44811-3_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LiLoLe—A Framework for Lifelong Learning from Sensor Data Streams for Predictive User Modelling

Abstract: Abstract. Adaptation in context-aware ubiquitous environments and adaptive systems is becoming more and more complex. Adaptations need to take into account information from a plethora of heterogeneous sensors, while the adaptation decisions often imply personalised aspects and individual preferences, which are likely to change over time. We present a novel concept for lifelong learning from sensor data streams for predictive user modelling that is applicable in scenarios where simpler mechanisms that rely on p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The textual evaluation method is: (a) frequently applied [Fetter and Gross 2014, Hedegaard and Simonsen 2013, Mendes 2015, da Silva et al 2017, Freitas et al 2016; (b) covers many user texts; and (c) considers spontaneous reports. Some studies have suggested that this method may: (a) require a lot of time or effort [Freitas et al 2016, da Silva et al 2017 if no methods are used to analyze the texts automatically; (b) does not precisely describe the use problems because it is limited to what has been reported by users about the system [Hedegaard and Simonsen 2013]; and, (c) may have influence of very satisfied or very dissatisfied users (who are more prone to express themselves) [Hedegaard and Simonsen 2014].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The textual evaluation method is: (a) frequently applied [Fetter and Gross 2014, Hedegaard and Simonsen 2013, Mendes 2015, da Silva et al 2017, Freitas et al 2016; (b) covers many user texts; and (c) considers spontaneous reports. Some studies have suggested that this method may: (a) require a lot of time or effort [Freitas et al 2016, da Silva et al 2017 if no methods are used to analyze the texts automatically; (b) does not precisely describe the use problems because it is limited to what has been reported by users about the system [Hedegaard and Simonsen 2013]; and, (c) may have influence of very satisfied or very dissatisfied users (who are more prone to express themselves) [Hedegaard and Simonsen 2014].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%