2016
DOI: 10.1080/07474938.2016.1183070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Likelihood-based panel cointegration test in the presence of a linear time trend and cross-sectional dependence

Abstract: This paper proposes a new likelihood-based panel cointegration rank test which extends the test ofÖrsal and Droge (2012) (henceforth Panel SL test) to allow for crosssectional dependence. The dependence is modelled by unobserved common factors which affect the variables in each cross-section through heterogeneous loadings. The common components are estimated following the panel analysis of nonstationarity in idiosyncratic and common components (PANIC) approach of Bai and Ng (2004) and the estimates are subtrac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach is very similar to the time-trend approach adopted in econometrics (e.g. [42] , [43] , [44] , [45] ), where time (such as year 2020) is a variable itself in the analysis (i.e., 20 if the analysis started in 2000 and is yearly based). This also implies that we have two kind of variables that characterize each individual: these are variables that differ in time (as mentioned above) and variables that do not change in time, just for each municipality (like population, density and so on).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach is very similar to the time-trend approach adopted in econometrics (e.g. [42] , [43] , [44] , [45] ), where time (such as year 2020) is a variable itself in the analysis (i.e., 20 if the analysis started in 2000 and is yearly based). This also implies that we have two kind of variables that characterize each individual: these are variables that differ in time (as mentioned above) and variables that do not change in time, just for each municipality (like population, density and so on).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the cointegration properties of the idiosyncratic components are examined by the PSL J def test of Arsova and Örsal (2018) and the P * −1 test of Örsal and Arsova (2017). The first test computes the panel test statistic as the standardized average of the individual LR trace statistics of Saikkonen and Lutkepohl (2000) computed from defactored data, while the second one combines the p values of these statistics by the inverse normal method.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Unobserved Common And Idiosyncratic Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%