2021
DOI: 10.1101/gr.272344.120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Likelihood-based deconvolution of bulk gene expression data using single-cell references

Abstract: Direct comparison of bulk gene expression profiles is complicated by distinct cell type mixtures in each sample that obscure whether observed differences are actually caused by changes in the expression levels themselves or are simply a result of differing cell type compositions. Single-cell technology has made it possible to measure gene expression in individual cells, achieving higher resolution at the expense of increased noise. If carefully incorporated, such single-cell data can be used to deconvolve bulk… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For deconvolution, we utilized RNA-Sieve (v0.1.4) 40 . Once an integrated scRNA-Seq dataset was properly annotated by cell type, we subset this to include only the 4 olfactory mucosal biopsies from Durante et al, 2020 in order to streamline computational workflow.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For deconvolution, we utilized RNA-Sieve (v0.1.4) 40 . Once an integrated scRNA-Seq dataset was properly annotated by cell type, we subset this to include only the 4 olfactory mucosal biopsies from Durante et al, 2020 in order to streamline computational workflow.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We eliminated genes only present in either the scRNA-Seq dataset or the bulk RNA-Seq datasets using index.intersection(). Raw counts for scRNA-Seq and bulk RNA-Seq datasets were prepped for running the deconvolution model with default settings, as described 40 . The deconvolution model was trained by running model_from_raw_counts() on the processed scRNA-Seq reference dataset.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For deconvolution performance on the pseudo-bulk and real bulk data with ground truth, we benchmark Scaden, RNAsieve, CIBER-SORTx, DWLS, MuSiC and Bisque [8][9][10][11][12]14 . We will describe the details of the benchmarking procedure below.…”
Section: Software Comparison and Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For deconvolution performance on the pseudo-bulk and real bulk data with ground truth, we benchmark Scaden, RNAsieve, CIBERSORTx, DWLS, MuSiC and Bisque [8][9][10][11][12]14]. We will describe the details of the benchmarking procedure below.…”
Section: Software Comparison and Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing methods can be roughly divided into two categories: statistical learning-based and deep learning-based methods. Based on traditional regression models like non-negative least squares (NNLS) and support vector regression (SVR), a series of methods like CIBERSORT (CS) [7], MuSiC [8], CIBERSORTx (CSx) [9], Bisque [10], DWLS [11], RNA-Sieve [12], and BLADE [13] have been developed. All these tools need a pre-selected cell-type-specific gene expression profile (GEP) or allocating different weights to different genes based on statistic value ( e .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%