2020
DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000000669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Like Yin and Yang”: Perceptions of Methamphetamine Benefits and Consequences Among People Who Use Opioids in Rural Communities

Abstract: Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate methamphetamine use among people who use opioids in rural Oregon communities to explore reasons for use and perceptions of methamphetamine consequences. Methods: We conducted interviews and surveys with participants who inject drugs or misuse prescription opioids in 2 rural Oregon counties with high opioid overdose rates. Survey participants were identified through participant-driven sampling in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
9
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These ndings align with a community-based study in Vancouver, Canada, that found those who use methamphetamine reported greater suspiciousness and paranoia compared to those who use opioids [28]. Methamphetamine-associated paranoia may magnify the general distrust of healthcare systems where PWUD frequently experience stigma [55,56] and may exacerbate skepticism about the transparency of research which is already elevated among rural residents [57]. Research enrolling people who use methamphetamines in rural communities should tailor recruitment and retention strategies to emphasize con dentiality and privacy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…These ndings align with a community-based study in Vancouver, Canada, that found those who use methamphetamine reported greater suspiciousness and paranoia compared to those who use opioids [28]. Methamphetamine-associated paranoia may magnify the general distrust of healthcare systems where PWUD frequently experience stigma [55,56] and may exacerbate skepticism about the transparency of research which is already elevated among rural residents [57]. Research enrolling people who use methamphetamines in rural communities should tailor recruitment and retention strategies to emphasize con dentiality and privacy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The present study has several limitations that will be subject to future research studies in which we will 1) administer Tempol following the injection of fentanyl or even higher potency analogues (e.g., sufentanil) in freely-moving male and female rats, in order to determine the efficacy of Tempol as a reversal agent against the profound cardiorespiratory responses that are elicited by these high potency synthetic opioids, and 2) inject Tempol following injection of fentanyl (following bolus or infusion paradigms) in combination with diazepam and/or methamphetamine in freely-moving male and female rats to provide information as to the efficacy of Tempol against the cardiorespiratory effects of these combinations, which are ever increasing real-world scenarios ( Warner et al, 2016 ; Macleod et al, 2019 ; Baker et al, 2021 ). Another important limitation of this study was that end-tidal PO 2 and PCO 2 were not continuously monitored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and female rats to provide information as to the efficacy of Tempol against the cardiorespiratory effects of these combinations, which are ever increasing real-world scenarios (Warner et al, 2016;Macleod et al, 2019;Baker et al, 2021). Another important limitation of this study was that end-tidal PO 2 and PCO 2 were not continuously monitored.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Rural communities are disproportionately burdened by opioid and methamphetamine use in the United States (Ellis et al, 2018 ; Palombi et al, 2018 ; Baker et al, 2020 ). Stigma and other barriers to accessing medical care can be magnified in rural settings where there are fewer options for healthcare services and perhaps less anonymity in medical interactions (Jones et al, 2009 ; Pullen and Oser, 2014 ; Buer, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%